开放教育研究
開放教育研究
개방교육연구
OPEN EDUCATION RESEARCH
2015年
3期
40-45
,共6页
慕课%认证机制%高等教育市场
慕課%認證機製%高等教育市場
모과%인증궤제%고등교육시장
MOOC%accreditation mechanism%higher education market
慕课利用信息技术打破了面对面教学的时空限制,具有为亿万人提供优质高等教育的潜力。但由于教育和劳动力市场存在信息不对称,慕课质量和学习者成就需要通过认证才能获得社会承认。大学是一个具有教育和认证功能的组织,必须向学习者保证服务质量并帮助其向雇主证明自己的能力。高等教育认证是大学获得学生和雇主信任的基石。目前的高等教育认证主要通过计算有形资源和学术成果对学校和专业进行评价,但慕课认证需要对课程和学习者做出评价。依据学习者的需求,高等教育慕课市场可细分为大学慕课市场和职业慕课市场。大学慕课认证的关键在于组建大学联盟,制定慕课认证标准,集体认可慕课学分。职业慕课认证的关键在于借用慕课开发者的信誉、颁发信息详细的电子证书,向雇主发送优质信号。美国一流大学的卓越声誉有利于职业慕课得到雇主认可,但学校间的利益冲突影响慕课进入大学校园。中国高等教育发展落后于美国,中国大学比美国大学更愿意承认和引进慕课,所以中国大学慕课认证应当侧重于遴选优质课程,职业慕课认证应当组建大学和企业联盟,通过权威认证促进市场成长。
慕課利用信息技術打破瞭麵對麵教學的時空限製,具有為億萬人提供優質高等教育的潛力。但由于教育和勞動力市場存在信息不對稱,慕課質量和學習者成就需要通過認證纔能穫得社會承認。大學是一箇具有教育和認證功能的組織,必鬚嚮學習者保證服務質量併幫助其嚮僱主證明自己的能力。高等教育認證是大學穫得學生和僱主信任的基石。目前的高等教育認證主要通過計算有形資源和學術成果對學校和專業進行評價,但慕課認證需要對課程和學習者做齣評價。依據學習者的需求,高等教育慕課市場可細分為大學慕課市場和職業慕課市場。大學慕課認證的關鍵在于組建大學聯盟,製定慕課認證標準,集體認可慕課學分。職業慕課認證的關鍵在于藉用慕課開髮者的信譽、頒髮信息詳細的電子證書,嚮僱主髮送優質信號。美國一流大學的卓越聲譽有利于職業慕課得到僱主認可,但學校間的利益遲突影響慕課進入大學校園。中國高等教育髮展落後于美國,中國大學比美國大學更願意承認和引進慕課,所以中國大學慕課認證應噹側重于遴選優質課程,職業慕課認證應噹組建大學和企業聯盟,通過權威認證促進市場成長。
모과이용신식기술타파료면대면교학적시공한제,구유위억만인제공우질고등교육적잠력。단유우교육화노동력시장존재신식불대칭,모과질량화학습자성취수요통과인증재능획득사회승인。대학시일개구유교육화인증공능적조직,필수향학습자보증복무질량병방조기향고주증명자기적능력。고등교육인증시대학획득학생화고주신임적기석。목전적고등교육인증주요통과계산유형자원화학술성과대학교화전업진행평개,단모과인증수요대과정화학습자주출평개。의거학습자적수구,고등교육모과시장가세분위대학모과시장화직업모과시장。대학모과인증적관건재우조건대학련맹,제정모과인증표준,집체인가모과학분。직업모과인증적관건재우차용모과개발자적신예、반발신식상세적전자증서,향고주발송우질신호。미국일류대학적탁월성예유리우직업모과득도고주인가,단학교간적이익충돌영향모과진입대학교완。중국고등교육발전락후우미국,중국대학비미국대학경원의승인화인진모과,소이중국대학모과인증응당측중우린선우질과정,직업모과인증응당조건대학화기업련맹,통과권위인증촉진시장성장。
Through applying information technology, MOOCs are breaking down the barrier of space and time in face-to-face teaching and making it possible to provide high quality education for billions of people. However, because of asymmetric information in education and labor market, the quality of MOOC and learners’ achievements can not be acknowledged by the public without accreditation. Conventionally, universities are both as educators and accreditors simultaneously. A university must assure learners the quality of its services and convince employers of the abilities of its graduates. Learners’ and employers’ trust in a university is built on the fact of its having been accredited. The pres-ent accreditations of higher education consist of college accreditation and program accreditati on which are based on the evaluation of physical resources and academic publications. However, the MOOC accreditation needs to evaluate both the courses and the learning outcome, therefore the three major MOOC platforms in the United States have adopt-ed several innovative strategies to make MOOCs credible. According to learners’ needs, MOOCs in higher education can be divided into two categories, MOOCs for university and MOOCs for career development. College students wish to replace or supplement their local courses with high quality MOOCs and thus enhance the outcome of their learning. The effective accreditation of MOOCs for universities requires forming a credit consortium who enact the standard for MOOC accreditation and coordinate collective recognitions of MOOC credits. Professionals wish that MOOC learning can help them quickly master the knowledge and skills, and secure opportunities of job interview and employment. The effective accreditation of MOOCs for career development depends on the prestige of MOOC developers and the informa-tive digitally verified certificates that can be considered as signals of high quality. The outstanding reputation of top u-niversities facilitates the acceptance of MOOC by employers but the conflicts among colleges hinder the entrance of MOOC to campus. Because higher education in China lags behind that of the US, Chinese colleges are more willing to accept and introduce MOOCs. So the accreditation of MOOCs for universities in China should emphasize on selection of courses with high quality. The accreditation of Chinese MOOCs for career developments should rely on a consortium of colleges and enterprises as well as the authoritative approval from the government to promote the growth of MOOC market . The open and competitive higher education market in the United States is conducive to discover the best accred-itation mechanism for MOOC. And we believe in order to improve the quality and competence of Chinese MOOCs, gov-ernment should give universities and MOOC platforms more freedom to design innovative accreditation mechanisms to meet the demand of higher education in China.