CAJ | 학술논문

本文基于不同区域技术水平存在差异的考虑，运用共同前沿方法分析2009～2013年中国整体以及东部、中部和西部三大区域的创新效率，利用“技术缺口比率（TGR ）”测算中国区域创新效率的技术差距。研究发现：不管是基于共同前沿还是区域前沿，从中国整体来看，中国的区域创新效率整体水平仍然偏低，提升空间比较大；区域前沿下测算出来的创新效率被高估了，共同前沿测算出来的创新效率反映了潜在提升空间；东部、中部和西部三大区域创新效率差异明显，东部地区的创新效率远远超过了中部和西部地区，代表了当前中国区域创新的最高水平。
본문기우불동구역기술수평존재차이적고필，운용공동전연방법분석2009～2013년중국정체이급동부、중부화서부삼대구역적창신효솔，이용“기술결구비솔（TGR ）”측산중국구역창신효솔적기술차거。연구발현：불관시기우공동전연환시구역전연，종중국정체래간，중국적구역창신효솔정체수평잉연편저，제승공간비교대；구역전연하측산출래적창신효솔피고고료，공동전연측산출래적창신효솔반영료잠재제승공간；동부、중부화서부삼대구역창신효솔차이명현，동부지구적창신효솔원원초과료중부화서부지구，대표료당전중국구역창신적최고수평。
〔Abstract〕 Based on the consideration of regional differences , the paper researches the whole and the three regional innovation effi-ciencies from 2009-2013 years under the meta-frontier . A quantitative Technology Gap Ratios (TGR) -based analysis has been made on the technology gap on regional innovation efficiency in China . The conclusions are as follows :no matter what the meta-frontier or re-gional-frontier is based on , from Chinese overall , the total level of China regional innovation efficiency is still low , and the promotion space is relatively large . The innovation efficiency is overrated under the regional -frontier . The innovation efficiency reflects the potential space to improve under the meta-frontier . The eastern , central and western regional innovation efficiency differences are obvious . The eastern part of the innovation efficiency is much higher than the central and western region , which represents the highest level of China's re-gional innovation .