铜仁学院学报
銅仁學院學報
동인학원학보
JOURNAL OF TONGREN UNIVERSITY
2015年
2期
53-57
,共5页
边缘族群%国家认同%容美土司
邊緣族群%國傢認同%容美土司
변연족군%국가인동%용미토사
peripheral ethnic groups%state identification%Rongmei native hereditary officials
基于“五服”的族群观，古代中国自战国起便延续着“边缘——中心”的族群结构，边缘族群对中心的认同也表现出离散错位式、矛盾式、依附式、抵制式和主体式五种认同模式。从历史看，容美土司国家认同显然沿着一条较理想的路径前进。在这一路径中，“边缘——中心”的误解不断化解，边缘族群的国家认同不断加深，内涵不断丰富，进而促进了一个向心的边缘的形成与稳定。
基于“五服”的族群觀，古代中國自戰國起便延續著“邊緣——中心”的族群結構，邊緣族群對中心的認同也錶現齣離散錯位式、矛盾式、依附式、牴製式和主體式五種認同模式。從歷史看，容美土司國傢認同顯然沿著一條較理想的路徑前進。在這一路徑中，“邊緣——中心”的誤解不斷化解，邊緣族群的國傢認同不斷加深，內涵不斷豐富，進而促進瞭一箇嚮心的邊緣的形成與穩定。
기우“오복”적족군관，고대중국자전국기편연속착“변연——중심”적족군결구，변연족군대중심적인동야표현출리산착위식、모순식、의부식、저제식화주체식오충인동모식。종역사간，용미토사국가인동현연연착일조교이상적로경전진。재저일로경중，“변연——중심”적오해불단화해，변연족군적국가인동불단가심，내함불단봉부，진이촉진료일개향심적변연적형성여은정。
There had been a periphery-center ethnic structure since the Warring States Period in ancient China, which resulted from a view that saw ethnic groups as scattering in five servant areas (wufu). Peripheral ethnic groups identified with center in five forms: disperse, contrary, dependant, resistive, and subjective. Historically,state identification in Rongmei native hereditary officials followed a fairly ideal course in which misunderstanding of center-periphery was constantly resolved, state identification in peripheral ethnic groups became strong and its connotation became rich, and the periphery was established as a stable center oriented one.
