CAJ | 학술논문

传统理论认为，应有权利、法定权利和现实权利三者之间按照应有权利到法定权利，再到现实权利这一逻辑顺序进行运转。然而，对应有权利的来源和根据的定位含混，以及过于倚重法定权利在权利运转中的中介作用，使得这一模式固定化，阻碍权利的理论视野。试在确定宪法作为应有权利的来源和根据的前提之下，发掘应有权利与现实权利可直接转化的运转新模式，及其对宪法司法化、宪法保留以及宪法现实性品质的相关启示。
전통이론인위，응유권리、법정권리화현실권리삼자지간안조응유권리도법정권리，재도현실권리저일라집순서진행운전。연이，대응유권리적래원화근거적정위함혼，이급과우의중법정권리재권리운전중적중개작용，사득저일모식고정화，조애권리적이론시야。시재학정헌법작위응유권리적래원화근거적전제지하，발굴응유권리여현실권리가직접전화적운전신모식，급기대헌법사법화、헌법보류이급헌법현실성품질적상관계시。
Traditional theory considered that the natural rights , legal rights and realistic rights operate according to this logical sequence:from the natural rights to the legal rights , then to realistic rights .However , the positioning of the source and basis of the natural rights is ambiguous , and the excessive emphasis on the intermediary role of the legal rights in the operation of rights makes the operational mode immobilized .Taking the Constitution as the source and basis of the natural rights , the paper explored the new operation that transition between the natural rights and the real rights , and explored the enlightenment to the constitutional judica-ture, constitutional reservation and reality quality of the Constitution .