中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
15期
1808-1810,1811
,共4页
糖尿病%动机性访谈%跨理论模型干预%健康教育
糖尿病%動機性訪談%跨理論模型榦預%健康教育
당뇨병%동궤성방담%과이론모형간예%건강교육
Diabetes mellitus%Motivational interview%Trans-theoretical model intervention%Health education
目的：探讨及研究动机性访谈联合跨理论模型干预在糖尿病患者健康教育中的应用效果。方法选取120例糖尿病患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组60例。对照组采用常规护理,观察组采用动机性访谈联合跨理论模型干预方法,比较两组患者干预前后的糖尿病知识认知程度及治疗效能感水平。结果观察组干预后1个月糖尿病知识认知优良率为85.00%,干预3个月后为95.00%,均高于对照组的60.00%,75.00%,差异有统计学意义( Z值分别为3.462,3.974；P<0.05)。观察组患者干预后1个月及3个月治疗效能感量表评估结果很高率分别为56.67%和75.00%,均高于对照组的33.33%,43.33%,差异有统计学意义(Z值分别为3.081,3.920；P<0.05)。结论动机性访谈联合跨理论模型干预在糖尿病患者健康教育中的应用效果较好,可有效提升患者的疾病认知度及治疗信心,从而达到疾病治疗的目的。
目的：探討及研究動機性訪談聯閤跨理論模型榦預在糖尿病患者健康教育中的應用效果。方法選取120例糖尿病患者為研究對象,按照隨機數字錶法分為對照組和觀察組,每組60例。對照組採用常規護理,觀察組採用動機性訪談聯閤跨理論模型榦預方法,比較兩組患者榦預前後的糖尿病知識認知程度及治療效能感水平。結果觀察組榦預後1箇月糖尿病知識認知優良率為85.00%,榦預3箇月後為95.00%,均高于對照組的60.00%,75.00%,差異有統計學意義( Z值分彆為3.462,3.974；P<0.05)。觀察組患者榦預後1箇月及3箇月治療效能感量錶評估結果很高率分彆為56.67%和75.00%,均高于對照組的33.33%,43.33%,差異有統計學意義(Z值分彆為3.081,3.920；P<0.05)。結論動機性訪談聯閤跨理論模型榦預在糖尿病患者健康教育中的應用效果較好,可有效提升患者的疾病認知度及治療信心,從而達到疾病治療的目的。
목적：탐토급연구동궤성방담연합과이론모형간예재당뇨병환자건강교육중적응용효과。방법선취120례당뇨병환자위연구대상,안조수궤수자표법분위대조조화관찰조,매조60례。대조조채용상규호리,관찰조채용동궤성방담연합과이론모형간예방법,비교량조환자간예전후적당뇨병지식인지정도급치료효능감수평。결과관찰조간예후1개월당뇨병지식인지우량솔위85.00%,간예3개월후위95.00%,균고우대조조적60.00%,75.00%,차이유통계학의의( Z치분별위3.462,3.974；P<0.05)。관찰조환자간예후1개월급3개월치료효능감량표평고결과흔고솔분별위56.67%화75.00%,균고우대조조적33.33%,43.33%,차이유통계학의의(Z치분별위3.081,3.920；P<0.05)。결론동궤성방담연합과이론모형간예재당뇨병환자건강교육중적응용효과교호,가유효제승환자적질병인지도급치료신심,종이체도질병치료적목적。
Objective To investigate and study the application effect of motivational interviewing combined with trans-theoretical model intervention in the health education of patients with diabetes mellitus. Methods A total of 120 patients with diabetes mellitus were selected as the research object, and were randomly divided into control group ( routine intervention ) and observation group ( motivational interview combined with trans-theoretical model intervention ) on average, then the diabetes knowledge awareness, treatment efficacy of diabetes in two groups before and after the treatment were respectively analyzed and compared. Results One month after intervention in the observation group, the excellent rate of diabetes knowledgeable awareness climbed to 85%, three months later, reached 95. 00%, higher than 60. 00% and 75. 00% of control group (Z=3. 462, 3. 974;P<0. 05). The efficacy treatment reached 56. 67% and 75. 00%after one and three months intervention in the observation group higher than 33. 33% and 43. 33% of the control group (Z=3. 081, 3. 920;P<0. 05). Conclusions The application effect of motivational interview combined with trans-theoretical model intervention is better to promote the health education of patients with diabetes mellitus, and it can effectively improve the disease awareness and treatment confidence, in order to achieve the goal of disease treatment.
