CAJ | 학술논문

目的：研究临床免疫检验分析前的质量控制影响。方法搜集本院2014年1月～2015年1月就诊的45例患者作为研究对象，根据是否进行分析前质量控制分为甲、乙组，甲组给予分析前质量控制，乙组不给予分析前质量控制，对比两组的免疫不合理的情况。结果（1）甲组患者的治疗有效率91.7%（22/24）高于乙组81.0%（17/21），P＜0.05；（2）甲组免疫球蛋白G、M、A、D、E检验符合率高于乙组，P＜0.05；（3）甲组检验不合格率8.3%低于乙组23.8%，P＜0.05。结论临床免疫检验分析前的质量控制的临床效果显著，可以有效提高患者的治疗有效率，降低检验不合格率。
목적：연구림상면역검험분석전적질량공제영향。방법수집본원2014년1월～2015년1월취진적45례환자작위연구대상，근거시부진행분석전질량공제분위갑、을조，갑조급여분석전질량공제，을조불급여분석전질량공제，대비량조적면역불합리적정황。결과（1）갑조환자적치료유효솔91.7%（22/24）고우을조81.0%（17/21），P＜0.05；（2）갑조면역구단백G、M、A、D、E검험부합솔고우을조，P＜0.05；（3）갑조검험불합격솔8.3%저우을조23.8%，P＜0.05。결론림상면역검험분석전적질량공제적림상효과현저，가이유효제고환자적치료유효솔，강저검험불합격솔。
Objective Quality control impact prior to clinical immunology inspection is to be investigated.Methods Select 45 patients who are received and treated in hospital from January 2014 to January 2015 as study cases and separate them into two groups according to whether they are given quality control research or not. Patients in Group A are given quality control research prior to clinical immunology inspection, while patients in Group B are not given quality control research prior to clinical immunology inspection; and then compare immunology unreasonable situation between two groups.Results (1) patients’ treatment efficacy is 91.7% (22/24) in Group A, which is much higher than 81.0% (17/21) in Group B,P<0.05; (2) test compliance rate of immunoglobulin G, M, A, D, E in Group A are much higher than counterparts in Group B,P<0.05; (3) defective percentage in Group A is 8.3%, which is quite lower than 23.8% in Group B, P<0.05.Conclusion Quality control research prior to clinical immunology inspection is rather efficiency; it is conducive to increasing treatment efifcacy and decreasing inspection defective percentage, thus, such research is of clinical application value.