中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
14期
1675-1677
,共3页
PICC%心电图特征性P波%尖端定位
PICC%心電圖特徵性P波%尖耑定位
PICC%심전도특정성P파%첨단정위
PICC%Characteristic P-wave ECG%Alignment
目的:探讨心电图特征性 P 波在 PICC 置管中尖端定位的效果。方法将2013年11月—2015年1月136例需要置入PICC的患者按照随机数字表法随机分为研究组与对照组各68例。研究组在PICC穿刺成功送管至右胸锁关节时连接心电监护仪,根据心电图上P波的变化确定导管末端的最佳位置。对照组常规PICC穿刺成功送导管至预测位置后,对患者进行X线拍片定位至理想位置。观察统计两种定位方法的准确率、时间、费用、预测长度与实际置入长度和患者一般资料。结果研究组患者定位准确率为94.1%,与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.318,P>0.05);研究组所需时间为(3.16±1.57)min,费用为(7.12±0.56)元,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(t 值分别为8.819,27.336;P<0.05)。两组患者一般资料、置管预测长度与实际置入长度比较差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论心电定位法省时、费用低,护患双方均避免了定位中X线辐射的伤害,可作为PICC置管定位的又一方法应用于临床。
目的:探討心電圖特徵性 P 波在 PICC 置管中尖耑定位的效果。方法將2013年11月—2015年1月136例需要置入PICC的患者按照隨機數字錶法隨機分為研究組與對照組各68例。研究組在PICC穿刺成功送管至右胸鎖關節時連接心電鑑護儀,根據心電圖上P波的變化確定導管末耑的最佳位置。對照組常規PICC穿刺成功送導管至預測位置後,對患者進行X線拍片定位至理想位置。觀察統計兩種定位方法的準確率、時間、費用、預測長度與實際置入長度和患者一般資料。結果研究組患者定位準確率為94.1%,與對照組比較差異無統計學意義(χ2=2.318,P>0.05);研究組所需時間為(3.16±1.57)min,費用為(7.12±0.56)元,與對照組比較差異有統計學意義(t 值分彆為8.819,27.336;P<0.05)。兩組患者一般資料、置管預測長度與實際置入長度比較差異均無統計學意義( P>0.05)。結論心電定位法省時、費用低,護患雙方均避免瞭定位中X線輻射的傷害,可作為PICC置管定位的又一方法應用于臨床。
목적:탐토심전도특정성 P 파재 PICC 치관중첨단정위적효과。방법장2013년11월—2015년1월136례수요치입PICC적환자안조수궤수자표법수궤분위연구조여대조조각68례。연구조재PICC천자성공송관지우흉쇄관절시련접심전감호의,근거심전도상P파적변화학정도관말단적최가위치。대조조상규PICC천자성공송도관지예측위치후,대환자진행X선박편정위지이상위치。관찰통계량충정위방법적준학솔、시간、비용、예측장도여실제치입장도화환자일반자료。결과연구조환자정위준학솔위94.1%,여대조조비교차이무통계학의의(χ2=2.318,P>0.05);연구조소수시간위(3.16±1.57)min,비용위(7.12±0.56)원,여대조조비교차이유통계학의의(t 치분별위8.819,27.336;P<0.05)。량조환자일반자료、치관예측장도여실제치입장도비교차이균무통계학의의( P>0.05)。결론심전정위법성시、비용저,호환쌍방균피면료정위중X선복사적상해,가작위PICC치관정위적우일방법응용우림상。
Objective To explore the comparative effects of the application of ECG characteristic P-wave in PICC tip alignment. Methods Totals of 136 patients who needed PICC intubation were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 68 cases in each group. In the experimental group,after the PICC was successfully delivered to the right sternoclavicular joint, the ECG monitor was connected and based on the changes of P-wave on ECG to determine the optimum position of the end of catheter. In the control group,after the PICC was successfully delivered tothe predictive position, patients were sent to the Radiology Department to receive X-ray and located to the optimum position. The alignment accuracy rate, intervention time, costs, the predictive position and practical position, and general information were compared. Results The alignment accuracy rate in the experimental group was 94. 1%, which had no significant difference (χ2 =2. 318,P>0. 05). The intervention time and cost of the experimental group were (3. 16 ± 1.57) min and (7.12 ±0.56) yuan, which were significantly different from those in the control group (t=8. 819,27. 336;P < 0. 05 ). The results of general information and the predictive position and practical positionhad no significant difference (P>0. 05). Conclusions ECG alignment is accurate, time-saving and with low costs and it can avoid the radiation harm for nurses and patients in X-ray alignment. ECG alignment can replace the traditional X-ray alignment and become another alignment method for PICC intubation in clinical application.