国际检验医学杂志
國際檢驗醫學雜誌
국제검험의학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
2015年
10期
1370-1372,1375
,共4页
孙立山%陆柳%汪明东%鹿麟%余明%范列英
孫立山%陸柳%汪明東%鹿麟%餘明%範列英
손립산%륙류%왕명동%록린%여명%범렬영
肾小球滤过率%肾小球滤过率估算方程%估算的肾小球滤过率
腎小毬濾過率%腎小毬濾過率估算方程%估算的腎小毬濾過率
신소구려과솔%신소구려과솔고산방정%고산적신소구려과솔
glomerular filtration rate%estimated glomerular filtration rate equations%estimated glomerular filtration rate
目的:比较3种肾小球滤过率(GFR)估算方程估算的GFR(eGFR)对人群肾功能评估的结果差异。方法本研究回顾性分析了门诊和住院患者中同时进行血清肌酐和胱抑素C检测者,共65856例,以3个估算方程分别计算eG FR ,并比较整体及不同肾功能分组人群eGFR结果的差异。以3个方程得到的eGFR对个体肾功能重新分期,比较肾功能各分期例数分布的差异。结果与肌酐方程估算eGFR比较,另两个方程估算eGFR的相关系数分别为0.81、0.90(均 P<0.05)。一致性分析GFR均值差值分别为6.19、1.79 mL/(min ×1.73 m2),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),应用肌酐方程估算eGFR时,明显高估了个体的肾功能分期。结论3种方程估算G FR有相关性但存在明显差异,在评估不同人群肾功能时应选择合适的估算方程。
目的:比較3種腎小毬濾過率(GFR)估算方程估算的GFR(eGFR)對人群腎功能評估的結果差異。方法本研究迴顧性分析瞭門診和住院患者中同時進行血清肌酐和胱抑素C檢測者,共65856例,以3箇估算方程分彆計算eG FR ,併比較整體及不同腎功能分組人群eGFR結果的差異。以3箇方程得到的eGFR對箇體腎功能重新分期,比較腎功能各分期例數分佈的差異。結果與肌酐方程估算eGFR比較,另兩箇方程估算eGFR的相關繫數分彆為0.81、0.90(均 P<0.05)。一緻性分析GFR均值差值分彆為6.19、1.79 mL/(min ×1.73 m2),差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),應用肌酐方程估算eGFR時,明顯高估瞭箇體的腎功能分期。結論3種方程估算G FR有相關性但存在明顯差異,在評估不同人群腎功能時應選擇閤適的估算方程。
목적:비교3충신소구려과솔(GFR)고산방정고산적GFR(eGFR)대인군신공능평고적결과차이。방법본연구회고성분석료문진화주원환자중동시진행혈청기항화광억소C검측자,공65856례,이3개고산방정분별계산eG FR ,병비교정체급불동신공능분조인군eGFR결과적차이。이3개방정득도적eGFR대개체신공능중신분기,비교신공능각분기례수분포적차이。결과여기항방정고산eGFR비교,령량개방정고산eGFR적상관계수분별위0.81、0.90(균 P<0.05)。일치성분석GFR균치차치분별위6.19、1.79 mL/(min ×1.73 m2),차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),응용기항방정고산eGFR시,명현고고료개체적신공능분기。결론3충방정고산G FR유상관성단존재명현차이,재평고불동인군신공능시응선택합괄적고산방정。
Objective To compare the difference of kidney function evaluated by using 3 different estimated glomerular filtration rate(GFR) equations in populations .Methods Retrospectively analyzed 65 856 patients who measured serum creatinine and Cysta‐tin C at the same time ,and come from the outpatients or inpatients of the hospital .The estimated GFR (eGFR) were calculated through 3 equations ,then compared the eGFR in the population and among different groups according to different kidney functions , and then grouped the people enrolled in the study again according to the eGFR calculated by using the 3 different equations and compared the differences among groups .Results Compared with the eGFR calculated by using Creatinine equation ,the correlation coefficients of the eGFRs calculated by using the other two equations were 0 .81 and 0 .90 ,respectively ,both P<0 .05 ;The differ‐ence between the means of eGFR were 6 .19 and 1 .79 mL/(min × 1 .73 m2 ) respectively with obvious significance (P<0 .01) ,in consistency analysis .There were obvious overestimation of kidney function when using Creatinine equation to calculate eGFR .Con‐clusion There is consistence and obvious difference by using the 3 CKD‐EPI′s eGFR equations .Physicians should choose suitable equations to evaluate kidney function in different populations .