浙江中医药大学学报
浙江中醫藥大學學報
절강중의약대학학보
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
5期
393-395
,共3页
便秘%功能性%小儿%推拿%清泄按揉法%手法%临床疗效
便祕%功能性%小兒%推拿%清洩按揉法%手法%臨床療效
편비%공능성%소인%추나%청설안유법%수법%림상료효
constipation%functionality%pediatric%tuina%eliminating the accumulative stagnation and heat with pressing and kneading manipulation%tech-nique%clinical curative effect
[目的]观察“清泄按揉法”治疗小儿功能性便秘的临床疗效。[方法]选择2009年12月至2013年6月在浙江省中山医院小儿推拿科门诊及浙江省中西医结合医院推拿科门诊收集的小儿功能性便秘60例，随机分为治疗组和对照组：对照组30例，采用常规小儿推拿进行治疗；治疗组30例，采用“清泄按揉法”小儿推拿进行治疗。隔天1次，5次为1个疗程，3个疗程后比较两组疗效。[结果]经3个疗程治疗后，治疗组治愈20例，好转8例，未愈2例，总有效率为93．33%；对照组治愈10例，好转12例，未愈8例，总有效率为73．33%。两组总有效率比较，差异有统计学意义(P<0．05)。[结论]“清泄按揉法”治疗小儿功能性便秘疗效明显高于常规小儿推拿治疗，并且其操作简便，值得推广。
[目的]觀察“清洩按揉法”治療小兒功能性便祕的臨床療效。[方法]選擇2009年12月至2013年6月在浙江省中山醫院小兒推拿科門診及浙江省中西醫結閤醫院推拿科門診收集的小兒功能性便祕60例，隨機分為治療組和對照組：對照組30例，採用常規小兒推拿進行治療；治療組30例，採用“清洩按揉法”小兒推拿進行治療。隔天1次，5次為1箇療程，3箇療程後比較兩組療效。[結果]經3箇療程治療後，治療組治愈20例，好轉8例，未愈2例，總有效率為93．33%；對照組治愈10例，好轉12例，未愈8例，總有效率為73．33%。兩組總有效率比較，差異有統計學意義(P<0．05)。[結論]“清洩按揉法”治療小兒功能性便祕療效明顯高于常規小兒推拿治療，併且其操作簡便，值得推廣。
[목적]관찰“청설안유법”치료소인공능성편비적림상료효。[방법]선택2009년12월지2013년6월재절강성중산의원소인추나과문진급절강성중서의결합의원추나과문진수집적소인공능성편비60례，수궤분위치료조화대조조：대조조30례，채용상규소인추나진행치료；치료조30례，채용“청설안유법”소인추나진행치료。격천1차，5차위1개료정，3개료정후비교량조료효。[결과]경3개료정치료후，치료조치유20례，호전8례，미유2례，총유효솔위93．33%；대조조치유10례，호전12례，미유8례，총유효솔위73．33%。량조총유효솔비교，차이유통계학의의(P<0．05)。[결론]“청설안유법”치료소인공능성편비료효명현고우상규소인추나치료，병차기조작간편，치득추엄。
Objective] To observe the clinical effect of“eliminating the accumulative stagnation and heat with pressing and kneading manipulation”treatment efficacy of children with functional constipation. [Method] Randomly divide 60 cases into control group and treatment group, 30 cases in each;the control one took conventional pediatric tuina method; the treatment one took “eliminating the accumulative stagnation and heat with pressing and kneading manipulation”method. Compare their effects after three courses. [Result] After three courses treatment, in treatment group, 20 cases had marked effect, 8 effective, 2 void, total effective rate 93.33%;in control group, they were respectively 10,12,8 and 73.33%. The comparison of total effective rates had difference of statistical significance(P<0.05). [Conclusion] The method of “eliminating the accumulative stagnation and heat with pressing and kneading manipulation”has better curative effect than the conventional pediatric tuina method. And it is very simple to manipulate, and worthy of being popularized.
