CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探析老年心绞痛患者的临床护理效果。方法搜集本院心血管内科2014年1月～2015年1月收治的43例老年心绞痛患者，按照护理方式的不同分为两组，甲组采取综合护理，乙组采取基础护理，对比两组护理效果。结果研究显示：两组比较，甲组患者护理有效性95.7%（22/23）、满意度100%、依从性95.7%，高于乙组85.0%（17/20）、90.0%、75.0%，差异显著，P＜0.05。结论老年心绞痛患者给予综合护理干预的临床效果显著，可以有效降低心绞痛的发作次数和发作持续时间。
목적：탐석노년심교통환자적림상호리효과。방법수집본원심혈관내과2014년1월～2015년1월수치적43례노년심교통환자，안조호리방식적불동분위량조，갑조채취종합호리，을조채취기출호리，대비량조호리효과。결과연구현시：량조비교，갑조환자호리유효성95.7%（22/23）、만의도100%、의종성95.7%，고우을조85.0%（17/20）、90.0%、75.0%，차이현저，P＜0.05。결론노년심교통환자급여종합호리간예적림상효과현저，가이유효강저심교통적발작차수화발작지속시간。
Objective Clinical nursing effect on elderly patients with angina is to be analyzed.Methods Choose 43 elderly patients with angina who are treated in Cardiology Department of hospital from January 2014 to January 2015 and separate them into two groups according to different treatment methods which are given comprehensive nursing and conventional nursing respectively, and then make a comparative study on nursing effects between two groups.ResultsPatients’ nursing efficacy is 95.7% (22/23), their satisfaction rate is up to 100% and compliance incidence is 95.7% in Group A that are given comprehensive nursing, which is much higher than 85.0% (17/20), 90.0% and 75.0% of patients who are given conventional nursing in Group B; there is a great differential between two groups,P<0.05. Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention is of efifcacy in treatment of elderly patients with angina; it is conducive to reducing patients’ angina attack times and its continued time. Thus, such a treatment method is of great clinical application value.