广西师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）
廣西師範學院學報（哲學社會科學版）
엄서사범학원학보（철학사회과학판）
JOURNAL OF GUANGXI TEACHERS COLLEGE(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2015年
3期
119-123
,共5页
合同纠纷%无名合同%合同性质认定
閤同糾紛%無名閤同%閤同性質認定
합동규분%무명합동%합동성질인정
Contract Disputes%Unnamed Contract%Contractual Identification
合同纠纷的难点在于合同性质及合同法律关系的认定。本文以一则真实的案例为起点对合同纠纷案件涉及的系列问题进行探讨。通过案例分析，得出如下结论，其一，在认定合同的性质时，不能仅看合同的名称和合同的内容孤立的判断，而应该采取主客观相结合的原则，考察订约目的以及实际履行情况加以综合认定；其二，关于买卖合同司法解释三的第一条（以送货单、结算单等认定合同成立法律应该支持）的解读，这一条款并不意味着法律对合同形式要件的放宽，而是出于解决纠纷的要求，是一个技术性规则而非价值性规则；在价值层面，为了更好地维护当事人利益，还是应该重视合同的形式，订立规范的合同；其三，对于“疑似”法律行为的准法律行为判断，不能够一刀切，一个行为中既包含法律行为，又包含事实行为的情况比较常见，应该对行为的内容进行分解，分别加以认定。
閤同糾紛的難點在于閤同性質及閤同法律關繫的認定。本文以一則真實的案例為起點對閤同糾紛案件涉及的繫列問題進行探討。通過案例分析，得齣如下結論，其一，在認定閤同的性質時，不能僅看閤同的名稱和閤同的內容孤立的判斷，而應該採取主客觀相結閤的原則，攷察訂約目的以及實際履行情況加以綜閤認定；其二，關于買賣閤同司法解釋三的第一條（以送貨單、結算單等認定閤同成立法律應該支持）的解讀，這一條款併不意味著法律對閤同形式要件的放寬，而是齣于解決糾紛的要求，是一箇技術性規則而非價值性規則；在價值層麵，為瞭更好地維護噹事人利益，還是應該重視閤同的形式，訂立規範的閤同；其三，對于“疑似”法律行為的準法律行為判斷，不能夠一刀切，一箇行為中既包含法律行為，又包含事實行為的情況比較常見，應該對行為的內容進行分解，分彆加以認定。
합동규분적난점재우합동성질급합동법률관계적인정。본문이일칙진실적안례위기점대합동규분안건섭급적계렬문제진행탐토。통과안례분석，득출여하결론，기일，재인정합동적성질시，불능부간합동적명칭화합동적내용고립적판단，이응해채취주객관상결합적원칙，고찰정약목적이급실제리행정황가이종합인정；기이，관우매매합동사법해석삼적제일조（이송화단、결산단등인정합동성입법률응해지지）적해독，저일조관병불의미착법률대합동형식요건적방관，이시출우해결규분적요구，시일개기술성규칙이비개치성규칙；재개치층면，위료경호지유호당사인이익，환시응해중시합동적형식，정립규범적합동；기삼，대우“의사”법률행위적준법률행위판단，불능구일도절，일개행위중기포함법률행위，우포함사실행위적정황비교상견，응해대행위적내용진행분해，분별가이인정。
Difficulties of contract disputes lie in the identification of contract nature and the legal relationships of the contract .T his paper takes a real case w hich is involved in a series of issues con‐cerned contract disputes as a starting point to make a study .Through case studies ,the following con‐clusions are achieved .First ,when identifying the nature of the contract ,we shall not just look at the contents of the contract as well as the name of the contract to make isolated judgments ,but shall a‐dopt the principle of subjective and objective combination ,to make an integral judgment by studying the purpose and actual performance of the contracts ;second ,the interpretation of the contract of sale of judicial interpretation on Article III (with delivery receipts ,statements and other identified contract law should support the establishment) of this provision does not mean that the formal requirements of the law of contract shall be relaxed ,but for requirements of dispute resolution ,w hich is a technical rule rather than the value of the rule;on the level of value ,in order to better safeguard the interests of the parties ,we shall pay attention to the form of the contract by signing standard contract ;third , for the“suspected”legal acts ,quasi‐legal judgment can not be clear‐cut ,for an act commonly contains both legal act and actual act .Therefore ,the contents of the act should be recounted ,and respectively identified .
