CAJ | 학술논문

罗汝芳作为阳明后学重要人士，其生平思想的研究有待进一步展开。由师承考述可见，罗汝芳的泰州学脉归属有误判之嫌。从阳明学整体视域考虑，罗汝芳学术传承具备独立江右的充分条件。与此同时，通过对思想家弟子门人诗文的搜辑和考辨，得证罗汝芳晚年思想呈现出对阳明学和白沙学的双向汲取。在此前提下，思想家在本体论层面偏向于“归宗性地”；在工夫论层面则主张“默识”。就以上两点展开探究，对罗汝芳思想的重判具有重要意义。
라여방작위양명후학중요인사，기생평사상적연구유대진일보전개。유사승고술가견，라여방적태주학맥귀속유오판지혐。종양명학정체시역고필，라여방학술전승구비독립강우적충분조건。여차동시，통과대사상가제자문인시문적수집화고변，득증라여방만년사상정현출대양명학화백사학적쌍향급취。재차전제하，사상가재본체론층면편향우“귀종성지”；재공부론층면칙주장“묵식”。취이상량점전개탐구，대라여방사상적중판구유중요의의。
As an important scholar of Post-Yangming Study,Luo Rufang’s life experience and philosophi-cal views need to be further probed into.According to the investigation of Luo Rufang’s teachers,it is not suit-able to regard Luo Ru-fang as a member of Taizhou School.Considering from the overall perspective of Yang-ming Study,Luo Rufang’s academic heritage is qualified to be one of the independent Jiangyou thinkers.Mean-while,with textual research and detailed analysis of the literary works by the disciples of the great thinkers,the present writer has found that in his old age,Luo Rufang accepted the views from both Yangming Study and Baisha Theory.In the light of documentary investigation and philosophical abstraction,Luo Rufang’s status on the ontological level tended to the returning to the origin,while on the level of his thinking history,he should be reassessed.Based on the two points,it is of great significance to reexamine his academic views.