CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨多索茶碱与氨茶碱治疗老年支气管哮喘的有效性及临床价值。方法100例支气管哮喘患者随机分为A组和B组，每组50例， A组患者给予氨茶碱治疗， B组患者给予多索茶碱治疗。比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果A组无效14例(28.00%)，有效25例(50.00%)，显效11例(22.00%)，总有效率为72.00%；B组无效3例(6.00%)，有效15例(30.00%)，显效32例(64.00%)，总有效率94.00%，两组治疗总有效率比较，差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)；B组应用多索茶碱进行治疗，声嘶、发热、吸气性呼吸困难、吸气性喉鸣及犬吠样咳嗽等症状消失时间较A组缩短，差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论多索茶碱治疗老年支气管哮喘起效快、疗效显著，值得积极推广使用。
목적：탐토다색다감여안다감치료노년지기관효천적유효성급림상개치。방법100례지기관효천환자수궤분위A조화B조，매조50례， A조환자급여안다감치료， B조환자급여다색다감치료。비교량조환자적치료효과。결과A조무효14례(28.00%)，유효25례(50.00%)，현효11례(22.00%)，총유효솔위72.00%；B조무효3례(6.00%)，유효15례(30.00%)，현효32례(64.00%)，총유효솔94.00%，량조치료총유효솔비교，차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)；B조응용다색다감진행치료，성시、발열、흡기성호흡곤난、흡기성후명급견폐양해수등증상소실시간교A조축단，차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론다색다감치료노년지기관효천기효쾌、료효현저，치득적겁추엄사용。
Objective To investigate effectiveness and clinical value of doxofylline and aminophylline in the treatment of senile bronchial asthma.Methods A total of 100 patients with bronchial asthma were randomly divided into group A and group B, with 50 cases in each group. The group A received aminophylline for treatment, and the group B received doxofylline. Curative effects of the two groups were compared.Results The group A contained 14 ineffective cases (28.00%), 25 effective cases (50.00%), and 11 excellent cases (22.00%), with the total effective rate as 72.00%. There were 3 ineffective cases (6.00%), 15 effective cases (30.00%), and 32 excellent cases (64.00%) in the group B, with the total effective rate as 94.00%. The difference of total effective rate between the two groups had statistical significance (P<0.05). After receiving doxofylline for treatment, the group B had shorter disappearance time of hoarseness, fever, inspiratory dyspnea, inspiratory laryngeal stridor, and barking cough than the group A. Their difference had statistical significance (P<0.05).Conclusion Doxofylline is quickly effective with precise effect in treating senile bronchial asthma, and it is worthy of active promotion and application.