分析仪器
分析儀器
분석의기
ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTATION
2015年
3期
58-64
,共7页
形态分析%锑%不确定度评定
形態分析%銻%不確定度評定
형태분석%제%불학정도평정
speciation analysis%antimony%uncertainty evaluation
主要研究利用液相色谱原子荧光联用技术对水中不同价态的金属锑进行检测,并用GUM 方法和Top‐Down技术的控制图法分别对其测量不确定度进行评定。实验结果发现GUM 方法步骤较为繁琐,对分析不确定度的来源分析容易造成遗漏或重复,对于某些不确定度来源可能难以定量。控制图法基于实验室质控工作数据,在确保数据具有正态性和独立性的前提下,评定不确定度能有效反应实验室长期质控状态,在水质检测领域的不确定度评定中更为适用。
主要研究利用液相色譜原子熒光聯用技術對水中不同價態的金屬銻進行檢測,併用GUM 方法和Top‐Down技術的控製圖法分彆對其測量不確定度進行評定。實驗結果髮現GUM 方法步驟較為繁瑣,對分析不確定度的來源分析容易造成遺漏或重複,對于某些不確定度來源可能難以定量。控製圖法基于實驗室質控工作數據,在確保數據具有正態性和獨立性的前提下,評定不確定度能有效反應實驗室長期質控狀態,在水質檢測領域的不確定度評定中更為適用。
주요연구이용액상색보원자형광련용기술대수중불동개태적금속제진행검측,병용GUM 방법화Top‐Down기술적공제도법분별대기측량불학정도진행평정。실험결과발현GUM 방법보취교위번쇄,대분석불학정도적래원분석용역조성유루혹중복,대우모사불학정도래원가능난이정량。공제도법기우실험실질공공작수거,재학보수거구유정태성화독립성적전제하,평정불학정도능유효반응실험실장기질공상태,재수질검측영역적불학정도평정중경위괄용。
The different valence antimony in water was determined by high performance liquid chroma‐tography with atomic fluorescence and the measured uncertainty was evaluated by the GUM method and the control chart method based on top‐down technique respectively. The experimental results showed that GUM method was more complicated , and it might cause omission or duplication , and quantify some sources of uncertainty difficultly. The data of the control chart method based on top‐down technique was from laboratory quality control work ,with assuring data normality and independence ,the calculation of uncertainty could effectively display laboratory quality control state in long‐term. It would take more obvi‐ous advantages of uncertainty evaluation in w ater quality test field.