证据科学
證據科學
증거과학
EVIDENCE SEIENCE
2015年
2期
248-257
,共10页
司法鉴定%专家辅助人%质证%交叉询问%规则
司法鑒定%專傢輔助人%質證%交扠詢問%規則
사법감정%전가보조인%질증%교차순문%규칙
Forensic examination%Expert assessor%Examination of evidence%Cross examination%Regulations
现代科学技术的迅猛发展对司法审判产生了巨大的影响,各种科学问题、技术证据、鉴定意见呈现于法庭,法官在审判案件中由于知识和经验的局限性而难以判断,在此背景下专家辅助人制度应运而生。英美法系有专家证人制度,存在完善的以交叉询问为主的专家证人出庭质证规则,大陆法系国家和地区有诉讼辅助人制度,虽然立法中没有明确的出庭质证规则,但是有完善的鉴定人出庭质证规则。我国当前专家辅助人出庭质证规则没有明确的规定,但准用证人出庭质证规则。不过目前缺乏进一步的理论阐述,且简单直接适用也存在问题,同时缺乏系统的、具体的、具有可操作性的质证规则。对此笔者提出构建专家辅助人出庭质证规则的建议。
現代科學技術的迅猛髮展對司法審判產生瞭巨大的影響,各種科學問題、技術證據、鑒定意見呈現于法庭,法官在審判案件中由于知識和經驗的跼限性而難以判斷,在此揹景下專傢輔助人製度應運而生。英美法繫有專傢證人製度,存在完善的以交扠詢問為主的專傢證人齣庭質證規則,大陸法繫國傢和地區有訴訟輔助人製度,雖然立法中沒有明確的齣庭質證規則,但是有完善的鑒定人齣庭質證規則。我國噹前專傢輔助人齣庭質證規則沒有明確的規定,但準用證人齣庭質證規則。不過目前缺乏進一步的理論闡述,且簡單直接適用也存在問題,同時缺乏繫統的、具體的、具有可操作性的質證規則。對此筆者提齣構建專傢輔助人齣庭質證規則的建議。
현대과학기술적신맹발전대사법심판산생료거대적영향,각충과학문제、기술증거、감정의견정현우법정,법관재심판안건중유우지식화경험적국한성이난이판단,재차배경하전가보조인제도응운이생。영미법계유전가증인제도,존재완선적이교차순문위주적전가증인출정질증규칙,대륙법계국가화지구유소송보조인제도,수연입법중몰유명학적출정질증규칙,단시유완선적감정인출정질증규칙。아국당전전가보조인출정질증규칙몰유명학적규정,단준용증인출정질증규칙。불과목전결핍진일보적이론천술,차간단직접괄용야존재문제,동시결핍계통적、구체적、구유가조작성적질증규칙。대차필자제출구건전가보조인출정질증규칙적건의。
The rapid development of modern science and technology had a huge impact on adjudications. Various scientiifc issues, technical evidence, appraisal opinion have been presented in court, which is dififcult for the judge at trial to determine, due to limitations in knowledge and experience. In this context an Expert Assessor System emerged in China. The Anglo-American system has an Expert Witness System, with matured examination rules on Expert Witness who testified at trial mainly based on cross-examination. In the meanwhile civil law countries and regions have established the Litigation Assistant System, although there is no explicitly stipulated Expert Examination Rules at trial. Nonetheless, a sound Rule of Appraiser Examination at trial does exist. Although China does not have speciifc regulations on expert assessor examination at trial, it is allowed to use witness examination rules at trial. However, the current system is lack of further theoretical elaboration and also problematical in straightforward applications. At the same time lacking of systematic, speciifc, workable court examination rules, for these problems, we made some proposals to build an expert assessor examination system in this article.