CAJ | 학술논문

在研究鸦片战争时，人们易受“奸臣模式”影响，在民族危难之际，林则徐是公认的民族英雄，琦善是可恶的卖国贼。人们关注臣子较多。然而对道光帝在历史转折中担任的角色关注较少，他与鸦片战争的失败到底有何关系？笔者认为，道光皇帝对鸦片战争的失败负重要的责任，整个战争过程中，其作为一国之君的决策能力和领导力都暴露出极大问题，从侧面也反映了当时中国的衰落。
재연구아편전쟁시，인문역수“간신모식”영향，재민족위난지제，림칙서시공인적민족영웅，기선시가악적매국적。인문관주신자교다。연이대도광제재역사전절중담임적각색관주교소，타여아편전쟁적실패도저유하관계？필자인위，도광황제대아편전쟁적실패부중요적책임，정개전쟁과정중，기작위일국지군적결책능력화령도력도폭로출겁대문제，종측면야반영료당시중국적쇠락。
In studying the Opium War, people vulnerable to"traitor mode"effect, in the occasion of national crisis, is recog-nized as a national hero Lin, Qi Shan is hateful traitor. People are more concerned about the courtiers. However, the turning point for the history of Emperor Daoguang in the role less attention, he failed in the end what is the relationship between the Opium War? The author believes that the failure of the Opium War dynasty emperor to bear an important responsibility, the whole course of the war, as the monarch of a country's decision-making ability and leadership are exposed enormous prob-lems, from the side of the decline also reflects the Chinese at that time.