CAJ | 학술논문

研究目的：土地权利冲突研究是构建、解决土地问题的基础，而权利冲突源自权利边界的模糊性和交叉性。解决土地权利冲突的关键，在于厘清土地上两种不同权利边界，构建中国本土化土地权利体系。研究方法：文献研究方法和定性分析方法。研究结果：中国土地权利冲突表现为土地权利部分缺失的消极冲突和同地不同权的积极冲突；冲突产生的社会背景在于从身份到契约的社会结构的基础性变革；从权利的本源考量，则根源于民法理论对人身权与财产权内在逻辑、伦理结构区别的漠视。研究结论：通过将土地上冲突的权利分析、定性，可以较好的区分不同权利内涵，构建边界清晰的土地权利，为农地“三权分置”实践提供理论基础。
연구목적：토지권리충돌연구시구건、해결토지문제적기출，이권리충돌원자권리변계적모호성화교차성。해결토지권리충돌적관건，재우전청토지상량충불동권리변계，구건중국본토화토지권리체계。연구방법：문헌연구방법화정성분석방법。연구결과：중국토지권리충돌표현위토지권리부분결실적소겁충돌화동지불동권적적겁충돌；충돌산생적사회배경재우종신빈도계약적사회결구적기출성변혁；종권리적본원고량，칙근원우민법이론대인신권여재산권내재라집、윤리결구구별적막시。연구결론：통과장토지상충돌적권리분석、정성，가이교호적구분불동권리내함，구건변계청석적토지권리，위농지“삼권분치”실천제공이론기출。
The purpose of this paper is to resolve the collisions of land right. The conflictions of rights are original from the fuzzy and overlappingboundaries of differentrights. Such conflictions are showed as negative and active ones. A fundamental change which is transformed from identity to property leads to the conflictions. Essentially, the differences that exist in logical and structure between the right of identity and property are ignored. The path to solve the conflictions depends on the clarification the boundary of two rights, and further on the development of the local right system above land. In conclusion, the Chinese government may make clear definition of the rights through analyzing the contents of rightto establish the new rights system.