CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探究腹股沟疝患者的不同手术治疗方式的临床疗效及术后情况。方法：收治男性腹股沟疝患者89例。按不同手术方式分为3组，传统修补组23例，Holypro 组38例，Bard 组28例。比较3组手术后恢复及合并症情况。结果：Holypro组和Bard组平均修补时间、平均术后住院时间、平均下床时间、阴囊水肿、尿潴留、伤口疼痛及术后复发均明显强于传统修补组(P＜0.05)；Holypro组尿潴留发生率明显高于Bard组(P＜0.05)。结论：无张力疝修补术明显优于传统修补术，而且其中Holypro补片效果与Bard补片接近。
목적：탐구복고구산환자적불동수술치료방식적림상료효급술후정황。방법：수치남성복고구산환자89례。안불동수술방식분위3조，전통수보조23례，Holypro 조38례，Bard 조28례。비교3조수술후회복급합병증정황。결과：Holypro조화Bard조평균수보시간、평균술후주원시간、평균하상시간、음낭수종、뇨저류、상구동통급술후복발균명현강우전통수보조(P＜0.05)；Holypro조뇨저류발생솔명현고우Bard조(P＜0.05)。결론：무장력산수보술명현우우전통수보술，이차기중Holypro보편효과여Bard보편접근。
Objective:To explore the clinical curative effects and postoperative situations of different operative treatment methods in 89 patients with inguinal hernia.Methods:89 male patients with inguinal hernia were selected.They were divided into 3 groups according to the different operative methods.The traditional repair group had 23 cases,Holypro group had 38 cases,Bard group had 28 cases.The postoperative recovery and complications were compared between 3 groups.Results:The average repair time, average postoperative hospitalization time,average offbed time,scrotal edema,uroschesis,wound pain and postoperative recurrence of Holypro group and Bard group were significantly stronger than those of the traditional repair group(P<0.05).The uroschesis incidence rate of Holypro group was significantly higher than that of Bard group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The non-tension herniorrhaphy is significantly better than traditional herniorrhaphy,and wherein the effect of Holypro patch is close to the effect of Bard patch.