CAJ | 학술논문

随着“专利标准化、标准国际化”趋势的发展，为实现打击市场竞争对手，获取垄断利润的目的，国外企业利用标准必要专利实施知识产权滥用行为的案例在现实中已不鲜见，对知识产权滥用行为进行相应的法律规制已经成为业界共识。然而，法律规制的前提是对行为性质的确定，而相关市场的界定则是确定知识产权滥用行为关键的基础性工作之一。针对目前我国反垄断立法中关于相关市场规定的疏漏和空白，借鉴欧美反垄断立法和司法中相关市场界定的经验，找寻适应标准必要专利相关市场界定的方法，并完善我国现有立法，为法官提供更为明确和具体的方法指引，是法官在现实标准必要专利反垄断纠纷中进行准确、合理界定相关市场的关键。
수착“전리표준화、표준국제화”추세적발전，위실현타격시장경쟁대수，획취롱단리윤적목적，국외기업이용표준필요전리실시지식산권람용행위적안례재현실중이불선견，대지식산권람용행위진행상응적법률규제이경성위업계공식。연이，법률규제적전제시대행위성질적학정，이상관시장적계정칙시학정지식산권람용행위관건적기출성공작지일。침대목전아국반롱단입법중관우상관시장규정적소루화공백，차감구미반롱단입법화사법중상관시장계정적경험，조심괄응표준필요전리상관시장계정적방법，병완선아국현유입법，위법관제공경위명학화구체적방법지인，시법관재현실표준필요전리반롱단규분중진행준학、합리계정상관시장적관건。
With the development of patent standardization and standard internationalization, there spring up numerous cases that foreign enterprises abuse intellectual property through adoption of SEPs, in order to beat competitors and obtain monopoly profits. It is a professional consensus to legally prevent intellectual property abuse.However, the prerequisite of legal regulation is defini-tion of behavior nature, where definition of relevant market is one of such basic tasks.Aiming at the status quo of omissions and blankness of antitrust law in China, it is vital to learn from European and American experiences.It is critical to correctly define relevant market of SEPs, to improve China’ s current legislation, and to provide more specific guidelines for judges, so that they can accurately and reasonably define relevant markets in antitrust lawsuits.