渭南师范学院学报
渭南師範學院學報
위남사범학원학보
JOURNAL OF WEINAN TEACHERS COLLEGE
2015年
11期
38-42
,共5页
《史记》%韩信诗评%韩信史评%韩信形象
《史記》%韓信詩評%韓信史評%韓信形象
《사기》%한신시평%한신사평%한신형상
Historical Records%poetry on Han Xin%historical comments on Han Xin%Han Xin’ s image
根据《史记》,尤其是《史记》人物而作的史评与诗评同为宋代《史记》阐释的重要成果。从某些角度看,宋代《史记》诗评甚至比史评更具首创价值与开拓意义。韩信作为《史记》着力刻画的人物之一,是宋人尤喜歌咏、讨论的人物形象之一。关于他的史评与诗评也在宋代趋于繁荣。宋代韩信诗评与史评相比,或就《史记》中的某一事件、某个细节首发议论,或先于史评提出某种观点,或对同代史评进行概括、提炼。不仅与同代史评相与呼应、互为补充、相得益彰,而且还为后代韩信评论提供了新的视角。从宋代韩信诗评与史评的关系中可以窥见《史记》诗评的丰富成果,证明《史记》诗评在《史记》接受史,尤其是阐释史中也应占有不容忽视的地位。
根據《史記》,尤其是《史記》人物而作的史評與詩評同為宋代《史記》闡釋的重要成果。從某些角度看,宋代《史記》詩評甚至比史評更具首創價值與開拓意義。韓信作為《史記》著力刻畫的人物之一,是宋人尤喜歌詠、討論的人物形象之一。關于他的史評與詩評也在宋代趨于繁榮。宋代韓信詩評與史評相比,或就《史記》中的某一事件、某箇細節首髮議論,或先于史評提齣某種觀點,或對同代史評進行概括、提煉。不僅與同代史評相與呼應、互為補充、相得益彰,而且還為後代韓信評論提供瞭新的視角。從宋代韓信詩評與史評的關繫中可以窺見《史記》詩評的豐富成果,證明《史記》詩評在《史記》接受史,尤其是闡釋史中也應佔有不容忽視的地位。
근거《사기》,우기시《사기》인물이작적사평여시평동위송대《사기》천석적중요성과。종모사각도간,송대《사기》시평심지비사평경구수창개치여개탁의의。한신작위《사기》착력각화적인물지일,시송인우희가영、토론적인물형상지일。관우타적사평여시평야재송대추우번영。송대한신시평여사평상비,혹취《사기》중적모일사건、모개세절수발의론,혹선우사평제출모충관점,혹대동대사평진행개괄、제련。불부여동대사평상여호응、호위보충、상득익창,이차환위후대한신평론제공료신적시각。종송대한신시평여사평적관계중가이규견《사기》시평적봉부성과,증명《사기》시평재《사기》접수사,우기시천석사중야응점유불용홀시적지위。
The comments and poetry about the characters which were based on Historical Records by Sima Qian were both the important achievements of Historical Records in Song Dynasty. The poetry was even more pioneering than the comments in some as?pects. Han Xin was one of the characters who were discussed in Song Dynasty. These poetry sought for some details or one topical act of Han Xin. They not only generalized the comments, but also came up with some new ideas. These poetry were supplement and a?greement of the comments. What’ s more, they had opened a new angle of view for the successors. It shows us that the reception his?tory of Historical Records supposedly values the poetry as well.