中国卒中杂志
中國卒中雜誌
중국졸중잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF STROKE
2015年
6期
531-534
,共4页
脑血管疾病%循证医学%网络教育%辅助教学
腦血管疾病%循證醫學%網絡教育%輔助教學
뇌혈관질병%순증의학%망락교육%보조교학
Cerebrovascular diseases%Evidence-based medicine%Network education%Auxiliary teaching method
目的探讨网络开放平台用于血管神经病学循证医学教学工作的效果。<br> 方法选取首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院2012级神经病学专业硕士研究生16人参加脑血管病临床实习，随机分为两组，实验组为以问题为基础的学习（problem-based learning，PBL）联合微信平台辅助教学组，对照组为传统教学组。由同一组临床指导教师授课，比较两组学生出科成绩及对教学方法的满意度。<br> 结果实验组学生考试平均成绩为（94.6±6.1）分，对照组学生考试平均成绩为（86.7±7.2）分，两组成绩比较，差异有显著性（P＜0.05）。实验组对教学方法满意度为100%，对照组对教学方法满意度为75%，两组比较差异具有显著性（P＜0.05）。<br> 结论在神经内科研究生脑血管病教学中采用以问题为基础学习的教学法，同时应用网络开放平台进行辅助教学取得良好成效，值得推广。
目的探討網絡開放平檯用于血管神經病學循證醫學教學工作的效果。<br> 方法選取首都醫科大學附屬北京天罈醫院2012級神經病學專業碩士研究生16人參加腦血管病臨床實習，隨機分為兩組，實驗組為以問題為基礎的學習（problem-based learning，PBL）聯閤微信平檯輔助教學組，對照組為傳統教學組。由同一組臨床指導教師授課，比較兩組學生齣科成績及對教學方法的滿意度。<br> 結果實驗組學生攷試平均成績為（94.6±6.1）分，對照組學生攷試平均成績為（86.7±7.2）分，兩組成績比較，差異有顯著性（P＜0.05）。實驗組對教學方法滿意度為100%，對照組對教學方法滿意度為75%，兩組比較差異具有顯著性（P＜0.05）。<br> 結論在神經內科研究生腦血管病教學中採用以問題為基礎學習的教學法，同時應用網絡開放平檯進行輔助教學取得良好成效，值得推廣。
목적탐토망락개방평태용우혈관신경병학순증의학교학공작적효과。<br> 방법선취수도의과대학부속북경천단의원2012급신경병학전업석사연구생16인삼가뇌혈관병림상실습，수궤분위량조，실험조위이문제위기출적학습（problem-based learning，PBL）연합미신평태보조교학조，대조조위전통교학조。유동일조림상지도교사수과，비교량조학생출과성적급대교학방법적만의도。<br> 결과실험조학생고시평균성적위（94.6±6.1）분，대조조학생고시평균성적위（86.7±7.2）분，량조성적비교，차이유현저성（P＜0.05）。실험조대교학방법만의도위100%，대조조대교학방법만의도위75%，량조비교차이구유현저성（P＜0.05）。<br> 결론재신경내과연구생뇌혈관병교학중채용이문제위기출학습적교학법，동시응용망락개방평태진행보조교학취득량호성효，치득추엄。
Objective To explore the effect of the open network platform in evidence-based medicine teaching of vascular neurology as the auxiliary teaching method for graduate students majoring in cerebrovascular diseases. <br> Methods A total of 16 graduate students of grade 2012 in Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University majoring in neurology were selected and randomly divided into two groups to participate in the clinical practice of cerebrovascular diseases. The experimental group used problem-based learning combined with the Weixin platform as the auxiliary teaching method and the control group was a traditional teaching group. Taught by the same group of clinical teachers, the two groups were then compared in the given scores and satisfaction degrees toward teaching methods. <br> Results The mean examination score of students in the experimental group was (94.6±6.1), while it was (86.7±7.2) in the control group, with signiifcant differences. The satisfaction degree toward the teaching method in the experimental group was 100%, while it was 75% in the control group, with signiifcant differences (P<0.05). The experimental group had a higher score than that of the control group and was satisifed with the new teaching method (P<0.05). <br> Conclusion The application of "problem centered" method in teaching vascular diseases for graduate students majoring in neurology combined with the auxiliary teaching method using the open network platform has a good result, which is worth promoting.
