中国电化教育
中國電化教育
중국전화교육
CET CHINA EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
2015年
6期
80-85
,共6页
MOOC%中国高校%慕课教育%高等教育%问题分析%对策
MOOC%中國高校%慕課教育%高等教育%問題分析%對策
MOOC%중국고교%모과교육%고등교육%문제분석%대책
MOOC%China Universities%MOOC Education%Higher Education%Situation Analysis%Countermeasure
两年来我国高校慕课教育在课程建设、平台运营等方面的很多问题有待于进一步探索,高校、教师、学生参与的积极性回落,支撑开放在线教育模式的生态系统均不完善。究其原因,一是我国高校尚未培育形成发展慕课教育的内在动力、开放教育理念;另一方面,慕课这一新事物在发展中也逐渐暴露出自身固有的内在矛盾。为了促进慕课健康发展,国家应加强顶层设计,保证有效的制度与政策供给;高校应为慕课教育的发展提供系统支持与配套服务,实行跨校学分互认,为慕课教育创造发展空间;教师应努力提高自己的信息素养、专业能力、教学水平,工作重心从知识传播向知识创造转移。
兩年來我國高校慕課教育在課程建設、平檯運營等方麵的很多問題有待于進一步探索,高校、教師、學生參與的積極性迴落,支撐開放在線教育模式的生態繫統均不完善。究其原因,一是我國高校尚未培育形成髮展慕課教育的內在動力、開放教育理唸;另一方麵,慕課這一新事物在髮展中也逐漸暴露齣自身固有的內在矛盾。為瞭促進慕課健康髮展,國傢應加彊頂層設計,保證有效的製度與政策供給;高校應為慕課教育的髮展提供繫統支持與配套服務,實行跨校學分互認,為慕課教育創造髮展空間;教師應努力提高自己的信息素養、專業能力、教學水平,工作重心從知識傳播嚮知識創造轉移。
량년래아국고교모과교육재과정건설、평태운영등방면적흔다문제유대우진일보탐색,고교、교사、학생삼여적적겁성회락,지탱개방재선교육모식적생태계통균불완선。구기원인,일시아국고교상미배육형성발전모과교육적내재동력、개방교육이념;령일방면,모과저일신사물재발전중야축점폭로출자신고유적내재모순。위료촉진모과건강발전,국가응가강정층설계,보증유효적제도여정책공급;고교응위모과교육적발전제공계통지지여배투복무,실행과교학분호인,위모과교육창조발전공간;교사응노력제고자기적신식소양、전업능력、교학수평,공작중심종지식전파향지식창조전이。
In recent two years, the MOOC education in China universities is facing many problems in the ifelds such as the MOOCs development, the operation of the MOOC platforms. The enthusiasm of participating in MOOC education of the universities, the faculties and the students is receding;the ecological systems are yet to improve. This is because the MOOC education development requires inherent drives, open education ideas and suitable educational systems. MOOC has some deifciencies in itself and does not ift for China universities. To Support MOOC development in China universities, the nation should strengthen the top level design and work out suitable systems and policies;the universities should provide overall service for the faculties to develop and using MOOCs. First of all, the academic credits should be granted between universities if the students take MOOC to learn and pass the test. At last, the faculties should promote their teaching skills as well as their professional level, and concentrate more of their energies on knowledge-creating instead of knowledge-sharing.