中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2015年
9期
1370-1372
,共3页
牙科材料%义齿修补%牙槽突%咀嚼
牙科材料%義齒脩補%牙槽突%咀嚼
아과재료%의치수보%아조돌%저작
Dental Materials%Denture Repair%Alveolar Process%Mastication
目的 比较热凝树脂基托全口义齿与注塑基托全口义齿修复低平牙槽嵴患者的咀嚼效率.方法 选择无牙合且牙槽嵴低平的患者共30例,按随机数字表法均分为两组,每组各15例.其中一组患者第1个月首先佩戴热凝树脂基托全口义齿,1个月后测量咀嚼效率,然后停止佩戴任何义齿1周,再佩戴注塑基托全口义齿1个月,1个月后测量咀嚼效率;另一组患者第1个月首先佩戴注塑基托全口义齿,1个月后测量咀嚼效率,然后停止佩戴任何义齿1周,再佩戴热凝树脂基托全口义齿1个月,1个月后测量咀嚼效率.以吸光度法测定患者咀嚼效率(OD值).结果 患者佩戴1个月热凝树脂基托全口义齿的咀嚼效率(OD值)为(0.608±0.124),佩戴1个月注塑基托全口义齿的咀嚼效率(OD值)为(0.885 ±0.071),经检验,注塑基托全口义齿的咀嚼效率明显高于热凝树脂基托全口义齿(t=14.845,P<0.05).所有患者在试验期间均未出现明显不良反应.热凝树脂基托全口义齿修复后咀嚼效率明显提高者共13例,提高率43.33%,注塑基托全口义齿修复后咀嚼效率明显提高者共24例,提高率80.00%,注塑基托全口义齿修复后的咀嚼效率提高率明显高于热凝树脂基托全口义齿(x2 =31.582,P<0.05).所有患者在研究期间未出现明显不良反应.结论 注塑基托全口义齿的制作精确度较高,咀嚼效率优于热凝树脂基托全口义齿,修复效果更加,值得临床推广.
目的 比較熱凝樹脂基託全口義齒與註塑基託全口義齒脩複低平牙槽嵴患者的咀嚼效率.方法 選擇無牙閤且牙槽嵴低平的患者共30例,按隨機數字錶法均分為兩組,每組各15例.其中一組患者第1箇月首先珮戴熱凝樹脂基託全口義齒,1箇月後測量咀嚼效率,然後停止珮戴任何義齒1週,再珮戴註塑基託全口義齒1箇月,1箇月後測量咀嚼效率;另一組患者第1箇月首先珮戴註塑基託全口義齒,1箇月後測量咀嚼效率,然後停止珮戴任何義齒1週,再珮戴熱凝樹脂基託全口義齒1箇月,1箇月後測量咀嚼效率.以吸光度法測定患者咀嚼效率(OD值).結果 患者珮戴1箇月熱凝樹脂基託全口義齒的咀嚼效率(OD值)為(0.608±0.124),珮戴1箇月註塑基託全口義齒的咀嚼效率(OD值)為(0.885 ±0.071),經檢驗,註塑基託全口義齒的咀嚼效率明顯高于熱凝樹脂基託全口義齒(t=14.845,P<0.05).所有患者在試驗期間均未齣現明顯不良反應.熱凝樹脂基託全口義齒脩複後咀嚼效率明顯提高者共13例,提高率43.33%,註塑基託全口義齒脩複後咀嚼效率明顯提高者共24例,提高率80.00%,註塑基託全口義齒脩複後的咀嚼效率提高率明顯高于熱凝樹脂基託全口義齒(x2 =31.582,P<0.05).所有患者在研究期間未齣現明顯不良反應.結論 註塑基託全口義齒的製作精確度較高,咀嚼效率優于熱凝樹脂基託全口義齒,脩複效果更加,值得臨床推廣.
목적 비교열응수지기탁전구의치여주소기탁전구의치수복저평아조척환자적저작효솔.방법 선택무아합차아조척저평적환자공30례,안수궤수자표법균분위량조,매조각15례.기중일조환자제1개월수선패대열응수지기탁전구의치,1개월후측량저작효솔,연후정지패대임하의치1주,재패대주소기탁전구의치1개월,1개월후측량저작효솔;령일조환자제1개월수선패대주소기탁전구의치,1개월후측량저작효솔,연후정지패대임하의치1주,재패대열응수지기탁전구의치1개월,1개월후측량저작효솔.이흡광도법측정환자저작효솔(OD치).결과 환자패대1개월열응수지기탁전구의치적저작효솔(OD치)위(0.608±0.124),패대1개월주소기탁전구의치적저작효솔(OD치)위(0.885 ±0.071),경검험,주소기탁전구의치적저작효솔명현고우열응수지기탁전구의치(t=14.845,P<0.05).소유환자재시험기간균미출현명현불량반응.열응수지기탁전구의치수복후저작효솔명현제고자공13례,제고솔43.33%,주소기탁전구의치수복후저작효솔명현제고자공24례,제고솔80.00%,주소기탁전구의치수복후적저작효솔제고솔명현고우열응수지기탁전구의치(x2 =31.582,P<0.05).소유환자재연구기간미출현명현불량반응.결론 주소기탁전구의치적제작정학도교고,저작효솔우우열응수지기탁전구의치,수복효과경가,치득림상추엄.
Objective To compare the masticatory efficiency of alveolar ridge restored by thermosetting resin full denture base and cast resin full denture base.Methods 30 patients with alveolar ridge were selected and divided intothe two groups by random number table and 15 cases in each group.Full denture with thermosetting resin base was worn in the first month in one group,and masticatory efficiency was measured.Then no false tooth was worn for a week,then full denture with cast resin base for a month,then masticatory efficiency was measured.In the other group,full denture with cast resin base was worn in the first month,and then masticatory efficiency was measured.Then no false tooth was worn for a week,then full denture with thermosetting resin base was worn for a month,then masticatory efficiency was measured.OD value as masticatory efficiency was measured by absorption spectrophotometry.Results The masticatory efficiency(OD value) of full denture with thermosetting resin base was (0.608 ± 0.124),and full denture with cast resin base was (0.885 ± 0.071).The masticatory efficiency of full denture with cast resin base was higher than that with thermosetting resin base (t =14.845,P < 0.05).There was 13 cases of increased masticatory efficiency with hot coagulation resin base denture repair,the improved rate was 43.33 %,while 24 cases with injection molding denture base denture repair,and the improved rate was 80.00%.The rate with injection molding denture base denture repair was higher than that with hot coagulation resin base denture repair(x2 =31.582,P < 0.05).There was no significant adverse reaction in duration of test among all the patients.Conclusion The definition of full denture with cast resin base manufacture was high,and the masticatory efficiency of full denture with cast resin base is higher than that with thermosetting resin base,and the repair effects is better.It is worth of clinical application.