中国实用医药
中國實用醫藥
중국실용의약
CHINA PRACTICAL MEDICAL
2015年
16期
264-265
,共2页
欧阳惠芳%张晓英%陈刘珍%梁锦笑
歐暘惠芳%張曉英%陳劉珍%樑錦笑
구양혜방%장효영%진류진%량금소
重型颅脑损伤%照顾者照顾负担水平%应对方式%相关性
重型顱腦損傷%照顧者照顧負擔水平%應對方式%相關性
중형로뇌손상%조고자조고부담수평%응대방식%상관성
Severe craniocerebral injury%Caregiver burden care level%Coping method%Correlation
目的:分析重型颅脑损伤患者照顾者照顾负担水平与主要照顾者应对方式的相关性。方法128例重型颅脑损伤患者相关资料进行分析,采用便利样本抽样,用Zarit照顾者负担量表(ZBI)和简易应对方式应对问卷调查,分析重型颅脑损伤患者照顾者照顾负担水平及主要照顾者的应对方式。结果重型颅脑损伤患者照顾者ZBI评分为(40.56±12.77)分,6.25%照顾者无照顾负担,93.75%存在照顾负担。主要照顾者积极应对维度评分为(1.45±0.61)分,低于常模(1.78±0.52)分(P<0.05);消极应对维度评分为(1.86±0.76)分,高于常模(1.59±0.66)分(P<0.05)。结论重型颅脑损伤患者的照顾者的照顾负担在临床上处于轻、中度水平,相关部门应该对照顾者采取积极有效的方式进行应对,减轻照顾负担,改善患者临床症状。
目的:分析重型顱腦損傷患者照顧者照顧負擔水平與主要照顧者應對方式的相關性。方法128例重型顱腦損傷患者相關資料進行分析,採用便利樣本抽樣,用Zarit照顧者負擔量錶(ZBI)和簡易應對方式應對問捲調查,分析重型顱腦損傷患者照顧者照顧負擔水平及主要照顧者的應對方式。結果重型顱腦損傷患者照顧者ZBI評分為(40.56±12.77)分,6.25%照顧者無照顧負擔,93.75%存在照顧負擔。主要照顧者積極應對維度評分為(1.45±0.61)分,低于常模(1.78±0.52)分(P<0.05);消極應對維度評分為(1.86±0.76)分,高于常模(1.59±0.66)分(P<0.05)。結論重型顱腦損傷患者的照顧者的照顧負擔在臨床上處于輕、中度水平,相關部門應該對照顧者採取積極有效的方式進行應對,減輕照顧負擔,改善患者臨床癥狀。
목적:분석중형로뇌손상환자조고자조고부담수평여주요조고자응대방식적상관성。방법128례중형로뇌손상환자상관자료진행분석,채용편리양본추양,용Zarit조고자부담량표(ZBI)화간역응대방식응대문권조사,분석중형로뇌손상환자조고자조고부담수평급주요조고자적응대방식。결과중형로뇌손상환자조고자ZBI평분위(40.56±12.77)분,6.25%조고자무조고부담,93.75%존재조고부담。주요조고자적겁응대유도평분위(1.45±0.61)분,저우상모(1.78±0.52)분(P<0.05);소겁응대유도평분위(1.86±0.76)분,고우상모(1.59±0.66)분(P<0.05)。결론중형로뇌손상환자적조고자적조고부담재림상상처우경、중도수평,상관부문응해대조고자채취적겁유효적방식진행응대,감경조고부담,개선환자림상증상。
Objective To analyze the correlation between burden care level of caregiver for severe craniocerebral injury patients and coping method of main caregiver.Methods Related data of 128 severe craniocerebral injury patients were analyzed in convenience sampleing. The Zarit burden interview (ZBI) and simplified coping style were applied for questionnaire to analyze burden care level of caregiver for severe craniocerebral injury patients and coping method of main caregiver.Results ZBI score of caregiver for severe craniocerebral injury patients was (40.56±12.77) points. There were 6.25% of them having no burden care, while 93.75% of them having burden care. Positive coping dimension score of main caregiver was (1.45±0.61) points, which was lower than norm score as (1.78±0.52) points (P<0.05). Their negative coping dimension score was (1.86±0.76) points, which was higher than norm score as (1.59±0.66) points (P<0.05).Conclusion Burden care level of caregiver is at mild and moderate level for severe craniocerebral injury patients. Caregiver ought to take active and effective method to cope for reducing burden care and improving clinical symptoms of patients.