CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察曲衍海动态取穴法对腹痛针刺的临床疗效。方法：选择以腹痛为主症的患者164例，随机分为研究组与对照组各82例。在辨证基础上，对照组采用常规分寸取穴法，直接取相关腧穴针刺；研究组采用曲衍海动态取穴法，即分别以各相关腧穴为基础循经按压，取压痛最敏感点针刺。每日治疗1次，每次30min，中间行针2次，观察治疗≤14天，比较两种取穴方法的临床效果。结果：研究组与对照组愈显率分别为93．1％和58．6％，研究组优于对照组（P＜0．01）；研究组与对照组总有效率分别为100％和97．6％，两组比较无显著性差异（ P＞0．05）。结论：曲衍海动态取穴法对腹痛的针刺治疗效果更为显著。
목적：관찰곡연해동태취혈법대복통침자적림상료효。방법：선택이복통위주증적환자164례，수궤분위연구조여대조조각82례。재변증기출상，대조조채용상규분촌취혈법，직접취상관수혈침자；연구조채용곡연해동태취혈법，즉분별이각상관수혈위기출순경안압，취압통최민감점침자。매일치료1차，매차30min，중간행침2차，관찰치료≤14천，비교량충취혈방법적림상효과。결과：연구조여대조조유현솔분별위93．1％화58．6％，연구조우우대조조（P＜0．01）；연구조여대조조총유효솔분별위100％화97．6％，량조비교무현저성차이（ P＞0．05）。결론：곡연해동태취혈법대복통적침자치료효과경위현저。
Objective:To observe the curative effect on abdominal pain by dynamic point location method from QU Yan-hai.Methods:164 patients with abdominal pain were enrolled in the experiment.They were divided into a treatment group and a control group evenly.Based on syndrome differentiation,the control group adopted the conventional point location method, acupuncturing the related points directly, and the treatment group a-dopted dynamic point location method from QU Yan-hai,first locating the point by the conventional point lo-cation method, then pressing along the channel nearby the points, puncturing into the most tender points.Pa-tients in both groups were punctured with the same conventional techniques retaining the needles for 30 mi-nutes every day.During the needle retaining period, manipulate the needles twice.Observation duration was less than 14 days.Results:The curative and markedly effective rates in the treatment group and control group were 93.1% and 58.6% respectively.There was a significant difference between two groups ( P <0.01 ) . Meanwhile, the total effective rates in the treatment group and control group were 100%and 97.6% respec-tively.There was no significant difference between two groups( P>0.05).Conclusion:Effect on abdominal pain by dynamic point location method from QU Yan-hai is obviously better than that by conventional meth-od.