中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2015年
11期
1635-1638,1639
,共5页
俞进友%仇建玲%朱正峰%高玉兰
俞進友%仇建玲%硃正峰%高玉蘭
유진우%구건령%주정봉%고옥란
高频热疗%化学疗法%抗肿瘤化疗方案,联合%肝肿瘤
高頻熱療%化學療法%抗腫瘤化療方案,聯閤%肝腫瘤
고빈열료%화학요법%항종류화료방안,연합%간종류
High frequency thermotherapy%Chemotherapy%Anti tumor chemotherapy,combination%Liver ne-oplasms
目的:探讨 EOF 方案化疗联合体外高频热疗治疗晚期原发性肝癌的临床疗效。方法选择晚期原发性肝癌患者75例,按区组随机化分组法随机分为两组,单纯化疗组(对照组)37例,采用 EOF 方案治疗;化疗联合热疗组(治疗组)38例,采用 EOF 方案化疗联合体外高频热疗治疗。比较两组临床疗效。结果治疗组有效率、疾病控制率、1年生存率、2年生存率分别为73.68%、92.1%、57.8%、10.5%,对照组有效率、疾病控制率、1年生存率、2年生存率分别为48.6%、56.8%、45.9%、5.4%,两组差异均有统计学意义(χ2=15.53、15.42、16.40、15.72,均 P <0.05)。结论EOF 方案化疗联合体外高频热疗治疗晚期原发性肝癌,可明显提高临床疗效和生存时间,不增加化疗的毒副反应。
目的:探討 EOF 方案化療聯閤體外高頻熱療治療晚期原髮性肝癌的臨床療效。方法選擇晚期原髮性肝癌患者75例,按區組隨機化分組法隨機分為兩組,單純化療組(對照組)37例,採用 EOF 方案治療;化療聯閤熱療組(治療組)38例,採用 EOF 方案化療聯閤體外高頻熱療治療。比較兩組臨床療效。結果治療組有效率、疾病控製率、1年生存率、2年生存率分彆為73.68%、92.1%、57.8%、10.5%,對照組有效率、疾病控製率、1年生存率、2年生存率分彆為48.6%、56.8%、45.9%、5.4%,兩組差異均有統計學意義(χ2=15.53、15.42、16.40、15.72,均 P <0.05)。結論EOF 方案化療聯閤體外高頻熱療治療晚期原髮性肝癌,可明顯提高臨床療效和生存時間,不增加化療的毒副反應。
목적:탐토 EOF 방안화료연합체외고빈열료치료만기원발성간암적림상료효。방법선택만기원발성간암환자75례,안구조수궤화분조법수궤분위량조,단순화료조(대조조)37례,채용 EOF 방안치료;화료연합열료조(치료조)38례,채용 EOF 방안화료연합체외고빈열료치료。비교량조림상료효。결과치료조유효솔、질병공제솔、1년생존솔、2년생존솔분별위73.68%、92.1%、57.8%、10.5%,대조조유효솔、질병공제솔、1년생존솔、2년생존솔분별위48.6%、56.8%、45.9%、5.4%,량조차이균유통계학의의(χ2=15.53、15.42、16.40、15.72,균 P <0.05)。결론EOF 방안화료연합체외고빈열료치료만기원발성간암,가명현제고림상료효화생존시간,불증가화료적독부반응。
Objective To discuss the clinical efficacy of advanced primary liver cancer under the chemother-apy of hyperthermia combined with EOF approach.Methods 75 patient samples who had advanced primary liver cancer in total were chosen and were divided into the two groups randomly.The control group containing 37 patient samples had advanced primary liver cancer which would be applied with EOF approach.The treatment group contai-ning 38 samples had advanced primary liver cancer.The treatment strategy was to apply EOF approach combined with high -frequency hyperthermia in vitro.Results The total rate of efficiency on the treatment group and control group was 73.68% vs 48.6%.The DCR rate was 92.1% versus 56.8%,1 year survival rate was 57.8% versus 45.9%and 2 years survival rate was 10.5% versus 5.4% which showed that the results of the treatment group was obviously better than that of the control group.Conclusion The method that combining the chemotherapy of hyperthermia with EOF to treat advanced primary liver cancer can obviously improve clinical efficacy and survival period.What′s better is that this approach will not increase the toxicity of chemotherapy.