CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨男性青少年情绪障碍患者防御机制的特点并比较与正常青少年防御机制的差异。方法对80例青少年情绪障碍患者（研究组）及161名正常男性青少年（对照组）采用防御方式量表（DSQ）测量，并进行对照研究。结果研究组 DSQ 量表中不成熟防御方式和掩饰因子评分高于对照组（P ＜0．01）；研究组 DSQ1中投射、被动攻击、潜意显现、抱怨、幻想、退缩、躯体化因子评分高于对照组（P ＜0．01）；研究组 DSQ3中制止和隔离因子评分高于对照组（P ＜0．05）。结论男性青少年情绪障碍患者较正常男性青少年会更多的使用不成熟型防御机制。
목적：탐토남성청소년정서장애환자방어궤제적특점병비교여정상청소년방어궤제적차이。방법대80례청소년정서장애환자（연구조）급161명정상남성청소년（대조조）채용방어방식량표（DSQ）측량，병진행대조연구。결과연구조 DSQ 량표중불성숙방어방식화엄식인자평분고우대조조（P ＜0．01）；연구조 DSQ1중투사、피동공격、잠의현현、포원、환상、퇴축、구체화인자평분고우대조조（P ＜0．01）；연구조 DSQ3중제지화격리인자평분고우대조조（P ＜0．05）。결론남성청소년정서장애환자교정상남성청소년회경다적사용불성숙형방어궤제。
Objective To investigate the characteristics of defense mechanism in male adolescents with mood disorders,and to explore the difference of defense mechanism between adolescents with mood disorders and normal adolescents.Methods 80 male adolescents with mood disorders (study group)and 161 healthy controls (control group)were assessed with Defensive Style Questionnaire (DSQ).Results Factor scores of immature defense styles (DSQ1 )and lie (DSQ4)in study group were significantly higher than those in control group (P <0.01 ).Scores of projection,passive aggression,acting out,complain, fantasy,retreat and somatization in DSQ1 in study group were significantly higher than those in control group (P <0.01).Scores of restrain and isolation in DSQ3 in study group were significantly higher than those in control group (P <0.05).Conclusion Male adolescents with mood disorders are more likely to use immature defense styles than normal adolescents.