华西口腔医学杂志
華西口腔醫學雜誌
화서구강의학잡지
WEST CHINA JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
2015年
3期
306-310
,共5页
焦纪兰%曾利伟%周灏%邓璐%周年苟%陈萍%江辉
焦紀蘭%曾利偉%週灝%鄧璐%週年茍%陳萍%江輝
초기란%증리위%주호%산로%주년구%진평%강휘
乙二胺四乙酸%次氯酸钠%自粘接树脂水门汀%剪切强度
乙二胺四乙痠%次氯痠鈉%自粘接樹脂水門汀%剪切彊度
을이알사을산%차록산납%자점접수지수문정%전절강도
ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid%NaClO%self-adhesive resin cement%shear bond strength
目的:评价乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和次氯酸钠(NaClO)对自粘接树脂水门汀与牙本质间粘接强度的影响。方法选择新鲜无龋、无裂纹的人离体前磨牙27颗,去除颊侧釉质,暴露浅层牙本质,随机分为对照组(A组)、EDTA组(B组)和NaClO组(C组)。分别选用蒸馏水、3%EDTA溶液和1%NaClO溶液处理牙本质表面后与自粘接树脂水门汀RelyX?Unicem进行粘接,将其中24个试件置于37?℃生理盐水中浸泡24?h后测定剪切强度,采用SPSS?17.0统计学软件对数据进行统计分析,在扫描电镜(SEM)和体视显微镜下分别观察粘接界面及断裂模式。结果 A组与B组的剪切强度分别为(8.55±0.63)?MPa和(8.47±0.56)?MPa,二者间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);C组的剪切强度为(12.97±0.59)?MPa,与A组和B组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。SEM下观察可见,C组自粘接树脂水门汀RelyX?Unicem与牙本质间结合紧密,但均未见树脂突,而A组与B组粘接界面均不理想。体视显微镜下观察可见,A组与B组试件破坏模式以内聚破坏为主,C组试件全部为内聚破坏。结论1%NaClO处理牙本质可以提高自粘接树脂水门汀RelyX?Unicem与牙本质之间的粘接强度,3%EDTA处理对提高自粘接树脂水门汀RelyX?Unicem与牙本质之间的粘接强度无影响。
目的:評價乙二胺四乙痠(EDTA)和次氯痠鈉(NaClO)對自粘接樹脂水門汀與牙本質間粘接彊度的影響。方法選擇新鮮無齲、無裂紋的人離體前磨牙27顆,去除頰側釉質,暴露淺層牙本質,隨機分為對照組(A組)、EDTA組(B組)和NaClO組(C組)。分彆選用蒸餾水、3%EDTA溶液和1%NaClO溶液處理牙本質錶麵後與自粘接樹脂水門汀RelyX?Unicem進行粘接,將其中24箇試件置于37?℃生理鹽水中浸泡24?h後測定剪切彊度,採用SPSS?17.0統計學軟件對數據進行統計分析,在掃描電鏡(SEM)和體視顯微鏡下分彆觀察粘接界麵及斷裂模式。結果 A組與B組的剪切彊度分彆為(8.55±0.63)?MPa和(8.47±0.56)?MPa,二者間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);C組的剪切彊度為(12.97±0.59)?MPa,與A組和B組間差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。SEM下觀察可見,C組自粘接樹脂水門汀RelyX?Unicem與牙本質間結閤緊密,但均未見樹脂突,而A組與B組粘接界麵均不理想。體視顯微鏡下觀察可見,A組與B組試件破壞模式以內聚破壞為主,C組試件全部為內聚破壞。結論1%NaClO處理牙本質可以提高自粘接樹脂水門汀RelyX?Unicem與牙本質之間的粘接彊度,3%EDTA處理對提高自粘接樹脂水門汀RelyX?Unicem與牙本質之間的粘接彊度無影響。
목적:평개을이알사을산(EDTA)화차록산납(NaClO)대자점접수지수문정여아본질간점접강도적영향。방법선택신선무우、무렬문적인리체전마아27과,거제협측유질,폭로천층아본질,수궤분위대조조(A조)、EDTA조(B조)화NaClO조(C조)。분별선용증류수、3%EDTA용액화1%NaClO용액처리아본질표면후여자점접수지수문정RelyX?Unicem진행점접,장기중24개시건치우37?℃생리염수중침포24?h후측정전절강도,채용SPSS?17.0통계학연건대수거진행통계분석,재소묘전경(SEM)화체시현미경하분별관찰점접계면급단렬모식。결과 A조여B조적전절강도분별위(8.55±0.63)?MPa화(8.47±0.56)?MPa,이자간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);C조적전절강도위(12.97±0.59)?MPa,여A조화B조간차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。SEM하관찰가견,C조자점접수지수문정RelyX?Unicem여아본질간결합긴밀,단균미견수지돌,이A조여B조점접계면균불이상。체시현미경하관찰가견,A조여B조시건파배모식이내취파배위주,C조시건전부위내취파배。결론1%NaClO처리아본질가이제고자점접수지수문정RelyX?Unicem여아본질지간적점접강도,3%EDTA처리대제고자점접수지수문정RelyX?Unicem여아본질지간적점접강도무영향。
ObjectiveThis?study?aims?to?evaluate?the?bond?strength?of?a?self-adhesive?resin?cement?to?dentin?by?ethylene-diamine?tetraacetic?acid?(EDTA)?and?NaClO.?Methods???Twenty-seven?freshly?extracted?non-carious?human?premolars?were?prepared?to?expose?the?buccal?dentin?and?randomly?divided?into?three?groups:?control?group?(A?group),?EDTA?group?(B?group)?and?NaClO?group?(C?group).?All?teeth?were?bonded?to?dentin?using?a?self-adhesive?resin?cement?after?the?teeth?in?the?A?group?were?processed?with?distilled?water.?The?B?and?C?group?were?processed?with?3%EDTA?and?1%NaClO,?respectively.?After?24?hours?at?37?℃?water,?the?shear?bond?strengths?of?the?twenty-four?specimens?were?measured.?All?statistical?analysis?was?performed?using?SPSS?17.0?software?package.?Each?fractured?specimen?was?examined?under?dental?microscope.?Three?new?specimens?were?cut,?and?the?morphologies?of?the?cement-dentin?interface?were?observed?under?scanning?electron?microscope?(SEM).?Results???The?shear?bond?strength?in?the?A?group,?B?group?and?C?group?was?(8.55±0.63),??(8.47±0.56)?and?(12.97± 0.59)?MPa,?respectively.?The?difference?between?A?group?and?B?group?was?no?statistically?significant?(P>0.05),?whereas?the?difference?between?C?group?and?B?group?(or?A?group)?was?statistically?significant?(P<0.05).?SEM?observation?of?the?cement-dentin?interface?in?the?C?group?showed?good?adaptation,?but?resin?tags?were?not?observed.?The?other?two?groups?showed?poor?bonding?interface.?Most?of?the?fractured?adhesive?dentin?surfaces?exhibited?cohesive?failure?in?the?A?group?and?B?group.?All?the?fractured?adhesive?dentin?surfaces?exhibited?cohesive?failure?in?the?C?group.?Conclusion???1%?NaClO?can?increase?the?bond?strength?of?self-adhesive?resin?cement?to?dentin,?but?3%EDTA?has?no?effect.