华西口腔医学杂志
華西口腔醫學雜誌
화서구강의학잡지
WEST CHINA JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
2015年
3期
296-300
,共5页
蒋程程%宋庆高%何苇%陈尚%洪滔
蔣程程%宋慶高%何葦%陳尚%洪滔
장정정%송경고%하위%진상%홍도
人体测量学%摄影测量学%准确性%精确性%三维
人體測量學%攝影測量學%準確性%精確性%三維
인체측량학%섭영측량학%준학성%정학성%삼유
anthropometry%photogrammetry%accuracy%precision%three-dimensional
目的:??通过对头部模型面部的测量分析,来研究iWitness摄影测量系统在颌面部应用的精确性与准确性。方法??利用iWitness摄影测量系统重复获取头部模型标志点的三维坐标值,来评估在不同状态下系统应用的精确性。通过计算模型三维测量的线性距离值与真实距离值之间的差异及分布情况来检查测量数据的准确性与偏倚性。结果?在非缩放状态与缩放状态下操作误差分别为0.20?mm和0.09?mm,两者间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);摄像误差为0.283?mm,与同一组图像的测量结果相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经多次校正的误差为0.251?mm,与仅作一次校正的摄像误差比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。距离测量差异集中于±0.4?mm之间,准确性较高,无偏倚。结论??iWitness摄影测量系统在颌面部的标志点定位与点距测量上具有较高的可信度,可应用于面部形态的评估与记录。
目的:??通過對頭部模型麵部的測量分析,來研究iWitness攝影測量繫統在頜麵部應用的精確性與準確性。方法??利用iWitness攝影測量繫統重複穫取頭部模型標誌點的三維坐標值,來評估在不同狀態下繫統應用的精確性。通過計算模型三維測量的線性距離值與真實距離值之間的差異及分佈情況來檢查測量數據的準確性與偏倚性。結果?在非縮放狀態與縮放狀態下操作誤差分彆為0.20?mm和0.09?mm,兩者間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);攝像誤差為0.283?mm,與同一組圖像的測量結果相比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);經多次校正的誤差為0.251?mm,與僅作一次校正的攝像誤差比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。距離測量差異集中于±0.4?mm之間,準確性較高,無偏倚。結論??iWitness攝影測量繫統在頜麵部的標誌點定位與點距測量上具有較高的可信度,可應用于麵部形態的評估與記錄。
목적:??통과대두부모형면부적측량분석,래연구iWitness섭영측량계통재합면부응용적정학성여준학성。방법??이용iWitness섭영측량계통중복획취두부모형표지점적삼유좌표치,래평고재불동상태하계통응용적정학성。통과계산모형삼유측량적선성거리치여진실거리치지간적차이급분포정황래검사측량수거적준학성여편의성。결과?재비축방상태여축방상태하조작오차분별위0.20?mm화0.09?mm,량자간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);섭상오차위0.283?mm,여동일조도상적측량결과상비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);경다차교정적오차위0.251?mm,여부작일차교정적섭상오차비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。거리측량차이집중우±0.4?mm지간,준학성교고,무편의。결론??iWitness섭영측량계통재합면부적표지점정위여점거측량상구유교고적가신도,가응용우면부형태적평고여기록。
Objective??This?study?aims?to?test?the?accuracy?and?precision?of?iWitness?photogrammetry?for?measuring?the?facial?tissues?of?mannequin?head. Methods??Under?ideal?circumstances,?the?3D?landmark?coordinates?were?repeatedly?obtained?from?a?mannequin?head?using?iWitness?photogrammetric?system?with?different?parameters,?to?examine?the?precision?of?this?system.?The?differences?between?the?3D?data?and?their?true?distance?values?of?mannequin?head?were?computed.?Results??Ope-rator?error?of?3D?system?in?non-zoom?and?zoom?status?were?0.20?mm?and?0.09?mm,?and?the?difference?was?significant?(P<0.05).?Image?captured?error?of?3D?system?was?0.283?mm,?and?there?was?no?significant?difference?compared?with?the?same?group?of images?(P>0.05).?Error?of?3D?system?with?recalibration?was?0.251?mm,?and?the?difference?was?not?statistically?significant?compared?with?image?captured?error?(P>0.05).?Good?congruence?was?observed?between?means?derived?from?the?3D?photos?and direct anthropometry, with difference ranging from ?0.4 mm to +0.4 mm.Conclusion??This?study?provides?further?evi-dence?of?the?high?reliability?of?iWitness?photogrammetry?for?several?craniofacial?measurements,?including?landmarks?and?inter-landmark?distances.?The?evaluated?system?can?be?recommended?for?the?evaluation?and?documentation?of?the?facial?surface.