中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
11期
72-73
,共2页
烧伤%烫伤后湿疹%中西医结合治疗%临床疗效
燒傷%燙傷後濕疹%中西醫結閤治療%臨床療效
소상%탕상후습진%중서의결합치료%림상료효
Burn%Eczema following burn or scald%Integrative medicine%Clinical efficacy
目的：探究在烧伤（或烫伤后）的湿疹治疗中，中西医结合治疗的临床疗效。方法：选取2011年1月-2014年6月在本中心进行治疗的烧伤（或烫伤后）湿疹治疗的患者93例，将其随机分为对照组和观察组，分别为45例、48例。所有患者均采用西医基础治疗，观察组患者则在西医治疗的基础上结合中医治疗，观察比较两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果：两组患者治疗，观察组患者的效果为显效、有效和无效分别33例、14例、1例，其临床治疗有效率为95.8%，而对照组患者的临床治疗效果为显效、有效和无效分别为16例、21例、8例，其临床治疗有效率为82.2%，观察组患者的临床治疗有效率明显高于对照组（P?0.05）。结论：在对烧伤或者烫伤后湿疹患者的临床治疗中，中西医结合治疗提高患者的临床治疗效果，值得在临床上推广使用。
目的：探究在燒傷（或燙傷後）的濕疹治療中，中西醫結閤治療的臨床療效。方法：選取2011年1月-2014年6月在本中心進行治療的燒傷（或燙傷後）濕疹治療的患者93例，將其隨機分為對照組和觀察組，分彆為45例、48例。所有患者均採用西醫基礎治療，觀察組患者則在西醫治療的基礎上結閤中醫治療，觀察比較兩組患者的臨床治療效果。結果：兩組患者治療，觀察組患者的效果為顯效、有效和無效分彆33例、14例、1例，其臨床治療有效率為95.8%，而對照組患者的臨床治療效果為顯效、有效和無效分彆為16例、21例、8例，其臨床治療有效率為82.2%，觀察組患者的臨床治療有效率明顯高于對照組（P?0.05）。結論：在對燒傷或者燙傷後濕疹患者的臨床治療中，中西醫結閤治療提高患者的臨床治療效果，值得在臨床上推廣使用。
목적：탐구재소상（혹탕상후）적습진치료중，중서의결합치료적림상료효。방법：선취2011년1월-2014년6월재본중심진행치료적소상（혹탕상후）습진치료적환자93례，장기수궤분위대조조화관찰조，분별위45례、48례。소유환자균채용서의기출치료，관찰조환자칙재서의치료적기출상결합중의치료，관찰비교량조환자적림상치료효과。결과：량조환자치료，관찰조환자적효과위현효、유효화무효분별33례、14례、1례，기림상치료유효솔위95.8%，이대조조환자적림상치료효과위현효、유효화무효분별위16례、21례、8례，기림상치료유효솔위82.2%，관찰조환자적림상치료유효솔명현고우대조조（P?0.05）。결론：재대소상혹자탕상후습진환자적림상치료중，중서의결합치료제고환자적림상치료효과，치득재림상상추엄사용。
Objective: To explore the burns or scalds eczema treatment in the clinical effect of combined chinese and western medicine. Methods: Selecting between January 2011 and June 2014 in our hospital for treatment of burn or scald after eczema treatment of 93 cases of patients, which were randomly divided into control group and observed group 45 cases, 48 cases respectively. All patients were treated with western medicine foundation. The observed group of patients, on the basis of western medicine combined with TCM treatment, observe the clinical therapeutic effect of two groups were compared. Results: Patients in two groups after treatment, the effect of observed group patients were shown that, 33 cases effective, 14 cases a little effective, 1 case invaild respectively. Its clinical effective rate of 95.8%, while the control group patients, according to the clinical treatment effect of powerfully that 16 cases effective, 21 cases alittle effective, 8 cases invaild respectively. Its clinical effective rate was 82.2%, and clinical treatment in patients with efficient observed group was obviously higher than that of control group (P?0.05). Conclusion: In the clinical treatment of patients with burn or scald after eczema, combine traditional chinese and western medicine treatment can improve the effect of the patient’s clinical treatment and is worth popularizing.
