中国医刊
中國醫刊
중국의간
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
2015年
6期
50-53
,共4页
曹英浩%池萍%张本厚%贺海丽
曹英浩%池萍%張本厚%賀海麗
조영호%지평%장본후%하해려
氟比洛芬%芬太尼%咪达唑仑%丙泊酚%无痛人工流产
氟比洛芬%芬太尼%咪達唑崙%丙泊酚%無痛人工流產
불비락분%분태니%미체서륜%병박분%무통인공유산
Flurbiprofen%Fentanyl%Midazolam%Propofol%Painless artificial abortion
目的观察氟比洛芬、芬太尼复合咪达唑仑与丙泊酚联合用于人工流产术的临床效果及不良反应。方法ASA分级玉级门诊患者90例随机分为观察组A组(氟比洛芬组)、B组(芬太尼组)和对照组C组(丙泊酚组)各30例。监测患者麻醉前2分钟(T0)、睫毛反射消失后(T1)、宫腔吸引(T2)、手术结束(T3)、患者苏醒时(T4)的平均动脉压、心率、氧饱和度(pulse oxygen saturation,SpO2)情况;记录三组患者注射丙泊酚的疼痛反应,记录麻醉效果、丙泊酚总用药量、术后苏醒时间、不良反应发生率以及患者苏醒时(T5),术后10分钟(T6)、术后20分钟(T7)的视觉模拟(visual analog scale,VAS)评分法。结果A、B两组血液动力学平稳(P<0.01)、丙泊酚用量较少(P<0.01)、苏醒时间快(P<0.01)、不良事件率低(P<0.01)。结论氟比洛芬或芬太尼复合咪达唑仑配伍丙泊酚用于无痛人工流产较单纯应用丙泊酚能明显减少丙泊酚的用量,血液动力学更加平稳,苏醒时间更短,而且在患者的舒适性上氟比洛芬要好于芬太尼。
目的觀察氟比洛芬、芬太尼複閤咪達唑崙與丙泊酚聯閤用于人工流產術的臨床效果及不良反應。方法ASA分級玉級門診患者90例隨機分為觀察組A組(氟比洛芬組)、B組(芬太尼組)和對照組C組(丙泊酚組)各30例。鑑測患者痳醉前2分鐘(T0)、睫毛反射消失後(T1)、宮腔吸引(T2)、手術結束(T3)、患者囌醒時(T4)的平均動脈壓、心率、氧飽和度(pulse oxygen saturation,SpO2)情況;記錄三組患者註射丙泊酚的疼痛反應,記錄痳醉效果、丙泊酚總用藥量、術後囌醒時間、不良反應髮生率以及患者囌醒時(T5),術後10分鐘(T6)、術後20分鐘(T7)的視覺模擬(visual analog scale,VAS)評分法。結果A、B兩組血液動力學平穩(P<0.01)、丙泊酚用量較少(P<0.01)、囌醒時間快(P<0.01)、不良事件率低(P<0.01)。結論氟比洛芬或芬太尼複閤咪達唑崙配伍丙泊酚用于無痛人工流產較單純應用丙泊酚能明顯減少丙泊酚的用量,血液動力學更加平穩,囌醒時間更短,而且在患者的舒適性上氟比洛芬要好于芬太尼。
목적관찰불비락분、분태니복합미체서륜여병박분연합용우인공유산술적림상효과급불량반응。방법ASA분급옥급문진환자90례수궤분위관찰조A조(불비락분조)、B조(분태니조)화대조조C조(병박분조)각30례。감측환자마취전2분종(T0)、첩모반사소실후(T1)、궁강흡인(T2)、수술결속(T3)、환자소성시(T4)적평균동맥압、심솔、양포화도(pulse oxygen saturation,SpO2)정황;기록삼조환자주사병박분적동통반응,기록마취효과、병박분총용약량、술후소성시간、불량반응발생솔이급환자소성시(T5),술후10분종(T6)、술후20분종(T7)적시각모의(visual analog scale,VAS)평분법。결과A、B량조혈액동역학평은(P<0.01)、병박분용량교소(P<0.01)、소성시간쾌(P<0.01)、불량사건솔저(P<0.01)。결론불비락분혹분태니복합미체서륜배오병박분용우무통인공유산교단순응용병박분능명현감소병박분적용량,혈액동역학경가평은,소성시간경단,이차재환자적서괄성상불비락분요호우분태니。
Objective To observe the clinical effects and adverse reactions of flurbiprofen or fentanyl combined with midazolam and propofol for painless artificial abortion. Method 90 patients who were ASA I were randomly divided into three groups :group A ( flurbiprofen) , group B ( fentanyl) and group C( propofol) ,and there were 30 cases in each group. We monitor the patient's MAP, HR, SpO2 2min before anesthesia (T0), after eyelash reflex disap-peared(T1), intrauterine attract (T2), the end of surgery (T3), awake (T4) respectively; And pain response when injecting propofol, anesthesia effects, the total dosage of propofol, postoperative recovery time, incidence of adverse events and VAS scores when patient awake (T5), 10min (T6) and 20min after surgery (T7). Result There was smoothly hemodynamics (P<0. 01), less dosage of propofol (P<0. 01), less recovery time (P<0. 01), low incidence adverse events (P<0. 01). Conclusion The doseage of propofol was less, hemodynamics were more stable, recovery time was shorter on Flurbiprofen or fentanyl combined with midazolam and propofol group compared with simplely propofol group. And flurbiprofen was better than fentanyl on patient's comfort.