刑事技术
刑事技術
형사기술
FORENSIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
2015年
3期
242-243
,共2页
邓淑娇%李萍%黄桂清%杨电
鄧淑嬌%李萍%黃桂清%楊電
산숙교%리평%황계청%양전
法医物证学%生物检材采集%生物检材保存%DNA产量
法醫物證學%生物檢材採集%生物檢材保存%DNA產量
법의물증학%생물검재채집%생물검재보존%DNA산량
forensic biological evidence%biological sample collection%biological sample preservation%DNA yield
目的:研究检材采集与保存方式对DNA提取效率的影响。方法使用生物检材采集与保存套管棉签、尖头棉签和普通医用棉签采集血样,分别放置于生物检材采集与保存套管或纸质物证袋中保存1周。剪取全部血样于96孔板中,用磁珠法结合自动化工作站提取DNA,以ABI7500型荧光定量PCR仪定量。结果生物检材采集与保存套管采集保存的血样所提取的DNA浓度平均为(2.54±0.63)ng/μL ,而尖头棉签、普通医用棉签采集并分别用纸袋保存的血样提取的DNA浓度平均为(2.06±0.44)ng/μL和(0.93±0.59) ng/μL。结论生物检材采集与保存套管较之于尖头棉签或普通医用棉签采集、纸袋保存方式,其获得的DNA浓度显著提高,DNA提取率高。
目的:研究檢材採集與保存方式對DNA提取效率的影響。方法使用生物檢材採集與保存套管棉籤、尖頭棉籤和普通醫用棉籤採集血樣,分彆放置于生物檢材採集與保存套管或紙質物證袋中保存1週。剪取全部血樣于96孔闆中,用磁珠法結閤自動化工作站提取DNA,以ABI7500型熒光定量PCR儀定量。結果生物檢材採集與保存套管採集保存的血樣所提取的DNA濃度平均為(2.54±0.63)ng/μL ,而尖頭棉籤、普通醫用棉籤採集併分彆用紙袋保存的血樣提取的DNA濃度平均為(2.06±0.44)ng/μL和(0.93±0.59) ng/μL。結論生物檢材採集與保存套管較之于尖頭棉籤或普通醫用棉籤採集、紙袋保存方式,其穫得的DNA濃度顯著提高,DNA提取率高。
목적:연구검재채집여보존방식대DNA제취효솔적영향。방법사용생물검재채집여보존투관면첨、첨두면첨화보통의용면첨채집혈양,분별방치우생물검재채집여보존투관혹지질물증대중보존1주。전취전부혈양우96공판중,용자주법결합자동화공작참제취DNA,이ABI7500형형광정량PCR의정량。결과생물검재채집여보존투관채집보존적혈양소제취적DNA농도평균위(2.54±0.63)ng/μL ,이첨두면첨、보통의용면첨채집병분별용지대보존적혈양제취적DNA농도평균위(2.06±0.44)ng/μL화(0.93±0.59) ng/μL。결론생물검재채집여보존투관교지우첨두면첨혹보통의용면첨채집、지대보존방식,기획득적DNA농도현저제고,DNA제취솔고。
ABSTRACT:ObjectiveTo explore the effect of sample collection and preservation on DNA yield.MethodsThe fresh anti-freezing blood from 30 volunteers was respectively dropped onto a swab from the casing for collection and preservation of biological sample, and the ones of both the cuspidal and the common medical. Each of the blood specimens was separately preserved in the casing or paper bags for a week. Every piece of DNA from the blood specimens was extracted by magnetic beads method in combination of automation workstation and was quantiifed by ABI 7500 Real Time System.ResultsThe average DNA concentration was (2.54±0.63) ng/μL for the blood specimens collected and preserved with the casings, (2.06±0.44) ng/μL and (0.93±0.59) ng/μL for those blood specimens which were collected with cuspidal swabs and common medical ones and followed to preserve in paper bags. The DNA yield was obviously higher using the casings than that of either the cuspidal swabs or the common medical ones to collect and then preserve in paper bags.ConclusionsThis test suggests that it is better to choose the casings for collection and preservation of biological sample than the cuspidal and the common medical swab.