中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2015年
14期
1019-1023
,共5页
马爱琴%叶秋云%姚晚侠%王瑞君
馬愛琴%葉鞦雲%姚晚俠%王瑞君
마애금%협추운%요만협%왕서군
生活质量%奥马哈系统%“居家不出”老年人
生活質量%奧馬哈繫統%“居傢不齣”老年人
생활질량%오마합계통%“거가불출”노년인
Quality of life%Omaha system%elderly with "homebound" state
目的 探讨奥马哈系统干预对社区“居家不出”老年人生理心理和社会交往等各个方面的影响,为有效干预“居家不出”老年人的生活状态,维持其生理心理等机能活动,提高老年人的生命质量提供参考依据.方法 按照随机数字表法将符合条件的218例“居家不出”老年人随机分为干预组和对照组,每组109例,干预组按照系统干预的方法从健康教育、治疗预案、个案管理、督促监督4个方面进行为期3个月(1～3次/周)的系统干预.对照组为空白对照.在干预前和干预后分别应用奥马哈系统评价表进行生理心理及社会交往等方面的评价.结果 干预前后,除生理方面子条目中的神经-肌肉-骨骼功能方面2组比较,t=2.03,P＞0.05,差异无统计学意义外,干预组在生理方面如循环评分高于对照组[(11.20±2.03)分比(8.72±1.36)分,t=10.30,P＜0.05],在心理方面如心理健康评分高于对照组[(12.53±1.42)分比(8.63±1.33)分,t=20.12,P＜0.05],差异均有统计学意义.结论 奥马哈系统干预可有效改善老年“居家不出”人群的生理心理和社会各个方面等亚健康问题,维持其生理心理等机能,提高老年人的生命质量.
目的 探討奧馬哈繫統榦預對社區“居傢不齣”老年人生理心理和社會交往等各箇方麵的影響,為有效榦預“居傢不齣”老年人的生活狀態,維持其生理心理等機能活動,提高老年人的生命質量提供參攷依據.方法 按照隨機數字錶法將符閤條件的218例“居傢不齣”老年人隨機分為榦預組和對照組,每組109例,榦預組按照繫統榦預的方法從健康教育、治療預案、箇案管理、督促鑑督4箇方麵進行為期3箇月(1～3次/週)的繫統榦預.對照組為空白對照.在榦預前和榦預後分彆應用奧馬哈繫統評價錶進行生理心理及社會交往等方麵的評價.結果 榦預前後,除生理方麵子條目中的神經-肌肉-骨骼功能方麵2組比較,t=2.03,P＞0.05,差異無統計學意義外,榦預組在生理方麵如循環評分高于對照組[(11.20±2.03)分比(8.72±1.36)分,t=10.30,P＜0.05],在心理方麵如心理健康評分高于對照組[(12.53±1.42)分比(8.63±1.33)分,t=20.12,P＜0.05],差異均有統計學意義.結論 奧馬哈繫統榦預可有效改善老年“居傢不齣”人群的生理心理和社會各箇方麵等亞健康問題,維持其生理心理等機能,提高老年人的生命質量.
목적 탐토오마합계통간예대사구“거가불출”노년인생리심리화사회교왕등각개방면적영향,위유효간예“거가불출”노년인적생활상태,유지기생리심리등궤능활동,제고노년인적생명질량제공삼고의거.방법 안조수궤수자표법장부합조건적218례“거가불출”노년인수궤분위간예조화대조조,매조109례,간예조안조계통간예적방법종건강교육、치료예안、개안관리、독촉감독4개방면진행위기3개월(1～3차/주)적계통간예.대조조위공백대조.재간예전화간예후분별응용오마합계통평개표진행생리심리급사회교왕등방면적평개.결과 간예전후,제생리방면자조목중적신경-기육-골격공능방면2조비교,t=2.03,P＞0.05,차이무통계학의의외,간예조재생리방면여순배평분고우대조조[(11.20±2.03)분비(8.72±1.36)분,t=10.30,P＜0.05],재심리방면여심리건강평분고우대조조[(12.53±1.42)분비(8.63±1.33)분,t=20.12,P＜0.05],차이균유통계학의의.결론 오마합계통간예가유효개선노년“거가불출”인군적생리심리화사회각개방면등아건강문제,유지기생리심리등궤능,제고노년인적생명질량.
Objective To investigate the effect of Omaha system intervention on social psychology of the elderly,and to provide evidence for effective intervention in elderly with "homebound" state.Methods 218 cases with "homebound" conditions were divided into intervention group and control group by random digits table with each group 109 cases.The intervention group accepted intervention including health education,treatment procedures,case management,supervision of the four aspects of 1-3 times a week according to Omaha intervention system for a period of 3 months.The control group was the blank control.And Omaha evaluation form was used to evaluate social psychological and physical effect before and after the intervention.Results 3 months after the intervention,except physiology in the field of neuromusculo-skeletal function of two groups had no significant difference (t=2.03,P＞0.05),scores in the intervention group in the field of physiology (like the circulation) were higher than the control group,the difference was statistically significant [(1 1.20±2.03) vs.(8.72±1.36),P＜0.05].As for psychology (like mental health),scores of intervention group were higher than that of the control group [(12.53±1.42) vs.(8.63±1.33),t=20.12,P＜ 0.05].Conclusions Omaha system can effectively improve the quality of life of elderly with "homebound" state and maintain their physiological,social and psychological function.
