CAJ | 학술논문

目的评价发表在中文护理核心期刊中的中医护理随机对照试验研究的报告与方法学质量.方法计算机检索中医护理随机对照试验研究,所有研究均发表在《2013年版中国科技期刊引证报告》排列前3名的护理期刊上.采用CONSORT标准和Cochrane协作网偏倚风险评价工具对随机对照试验研究的报告与方法学质量进行评价.结果本次研究共纳入135篇文献.在CONSORT标准的37条评价项目中,所有研究对其中的14条项目未进行报告,同时未对CONSORT流程图进行报告;在Cochrane协作网偏倚风险评价工具中,存在高偏倚风险的文献占17.0％(23/135),其余的偏倚风险不确定.结论中医护理随机对照试验研究的报告与方法学质量均有待进一步提高.
목적 평개발표재중문호리핵심기간중적중의호리수궤대조시험연구적보고여방법학질량.방법 계산궤검색중의호리수궤대조시험연구,소유연구균발표재《2013년판중국과기기간인증보고》배렬전3명적호리기간상.채용CONSORT표준화Cochrane협작망편의풍험평개공구대수궤대조시험연구적보고여방법학질량진행평개.결과 본차연구공납입135편문헌.재CONSORT표준적37조평개항목중,소유연구대기중적14조항목미진행보고,동시미대CONSORT류정도진행보고;재Cochrane협작망편의풍험평개공구중,존재고편의풍험적문헌점17.0％(23/135),기여적편의풍험불학정.결론 중의호리수궤대조시험연구적보고여방법학질량균유대진일보제고.
Objective To evaluate the reporting and methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related traditional Chinese medical nursing which published in key Chinese journals.Methods Electronic databases were searched for collecting RCTs related traditional Chinese medical nursing which published in key Chinese journals.The impact factors of all these journals ranked the first three in the Chinese S & T journal citation reports,2013.The CONSORT statement and Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool were applied to evaluate the reporting and methodological quality respectively.Results A total of 135 articles were identified to meet the criteria.To the best of our knowledge,however,none of these articles have reported the 14 items in the CONSORT statement,either without the CONSORT flow diagram.According to the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool,17.0％(23/135) of these articles was confirmed to be high risk of bias,with the rest uncertain in the degree of bias.Conclusions The reporting and methodological quality of RCTs on traditional Chinese medical nursing were poor.It is urgent to improve the methodological and reporting quality of RCTs on traditional Chinese medical nursing researches.