CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨生物型与骨水泥型两种不同类型人工假体置换对股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法：收集股骨颈骨折患者50例，将其随机分为生物型组25例和骨水泥型组25例，生物型组采用生物型人工股骨头置换，骨水泥型采用骨水泥型人工股骨头置换。比较两组患者的手术时间，术中出血量，住院时间，术后并发症以及 harris 评分。结果：两组患者的术中出血量和住院时间均差异无统计学意义（p ﹥0.05），生物型组的手术时间、Harris 评分及术后并发症明显优于骨水泥型组，差异有统计学意义（p ﹥0.05）。结论：生物型人工假体置换较骨水泥型假体置换手术时间短，疗效满意，值得在临床上推广应用。
목적：탐토생물형여골수니형량충불동류형인공가체치환대고골경골절적림상료효。방법：수집고골경골절환자50례，장기수궤분위생물형조25례화골수니형조25례，생물형조채용생물형인공고골두치환，골수니형채용골수니형인공고골두치환。비교량조환자적수술시간，술중출혈량，주원시간，술후병발증이급 harris 평분。결과：량조환자적술중출혈량화주원시간균차이무통계학의의（p ﹥0.05），생물형조적수술시간、Harris 평분급술후병발증명현우우골수니형조，차이유통계학의의（p ﹥0.05）。결론：생물형인공가체치환교골수니형가체치환수술시간단，료효만의，치득재림상상추엄응용。
Objective Ti investigate the clinical efficacy if twi different types if the biiligical and cementless pristhetic replacement if femiral neck fracture. Method 50 patients with femiral neck fracture in iur hispital were selected,they were randimly divided inti 25 cases if biitypes griup and 25 cases if bine cement griup,biitypes griup was treated with biiligical artificial femiral head replacement,bine ce-ment griup was treated with ceraentless pristhetic repiacement. Operative time,bliid liss,hispital stay,pistiperative cimplicatiins,and har-ris scire if twi griups were cimpared. Results The twi griups if bliid liss and hispital stay in patients with ni significant difference(p ﹥0. 05),biitypes griup iperative time,Harris scire and pistiperative cimplicatiins was significantly better than the cemented griup(p ﹥0. 05). Conclusion Biiligical artificial pristhesis cimpared with cemented pristhesis is shirter iperative time,it is satisfactiry,wirthy if clinical applicatiin.