临床护理杂志
臨床護理雜誌
림상호리잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
2015年
3期
13-15
,共3页
亚健康%护理干预
亞健康%護理榦預
아건강%호리간예
subhealth%nursing intervention
目的:探讨本市城镇居民健康促进生活方式与亚健康状态的关系,为本地区亚健康人群不同生活方式的干预提供指导。方法采用《健康促进生活方式量表》(HPLP-Ⅱ)及《亚健康评定量表》(SHMSV1.0)对2428名在本院行常规身体检查的本市常住正常健康居民进行问卷调查,并对调查结果进行统计学分析。结果2428名被调查者中,健康者458例(18.86%),亚健康者1970例(81.14%)。健康人群SHMSV1.0评分为(88.45±5.23),亚健康人群SHMSV1.0评分为(61.96±4.25),有显著性差异(P<0.05)。健康人群 HPLP -Ⅱ评分为(115.22±8.45),亚健康人群 HPLP -Ⅱ评分为(98.12±7.26)。亚健康人群HPLP-Ⅱ总分及各维度评分显著低于健康人群(P<0.05)。亚健康状态与自我实现、运动锻炼、压力管理呈负相关(P<0.05)。结论本市城镇居民亚健康比例较高,亚健康与健康促进方式有关,其中压力管理、运动锻炼、自我实现是亚健康的保护因素。
目的:探討本市城鎮居民健康促進生活方式與亞健康狀態的關繫,為本地區亞健康人群不同生活方式的榦預提供指導。方法採用《健康促進生活方式量錶》(HPLP-Ⅱ)及《亞健康評定量錶》(SHMSV1.0)對2428名在本院行常規身體檢查的本市常住正常健康居民進行問捲調查,併對調查結果進行統計學分析。結果2428名被調查者中,健康者458例(18.86%),亞健康者1970例(81.14%)。健康人群SHMSV1.0評分為(88.45±5.23),亞健康人群SHMSV1.0評分為(61.96±4.25),有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。健康人群 HPLP -Ⅱ評分為(115.22±8.45),亞健康人群 HPLP -Ⅱ評分為(98.12±7.26)。亞健康人群HPLP-Ⅱ總分及各維度評分顯著低于健康人群(P<0.05)。亞健康狀態與自我實現、運動鍛煉、壓力管理呈負相關(P<0.05)。結論本市城鎮居民亞健康比例較高,亞健康與健康促進方式有關,其中壓力管理、運動鍛煉、自我實現是亞健康的保護因素。
목적:탐토본시성진거민건강촉진생활방식여아건강상태적관계,위본지구아건강인군불동생활방식적간예제공지도。방법채용《건강촉진생활방식량표》(HPLP-Ⅱ)급《아건강평정량표》(SHMSV1.0)대2428명재본원행상규신체검사적본시상주정상건강거민진행문권조사,병대조사결과진행통계학분석。결과2428명피조사자중,건강자458례(18.86%),아건강자1970례(81.14%)。건강인군SHMSV1.0평분위(88.45±5.23),아건강인군SHMSV1.0평분위(61.96±4.25),유현저성차이(P<0.05)。건강인군 HPLP -Ⅱ평분위(115.22±8.45),아건강인군 HPLP -Ⅱ평분위(98.12±7.26)。아건강인군HPLP-Ⅱ총분급각유도평분현저저우건강인군(P<0.05)。아건강상태여자아실현、운동단련、압력관리정부상관(P<0.05)。결론본시성진거민아건강비례교고,아건강여건강촉진방식유관,기중압력관리、운동단련、자아실현시아건강적보호인소。
Objective To investigate the relationship between the city's urban residents in health‐promoting lifestyle and sub‐health status , to provide guidance of different lifestyle interventions . Method 2428 with routine physical examination in our hospital were accepted permanent resi‐dents healthy questionnaire ,and analyzed the survey results with Health Promoting Lifestyle Scale"(HPLP- Ⅱ) and"sub Rating Scale" (SHMSV1 .0) .Results There were 458 cases of healthy persons (18 .86% ) ,sub‐health were 1970 cases (81 .14% ) .Healthy people SHMSV1 .0 was (88 .45 ± 5 .23) ,health groups SHMSV1 .0 was (61 .96 ± 4 .25) points ,the differ‐ence was statistically significant (P<0 .05) .Healthy people HPLP-Ⅱ (115 .22 ± 8 .45) points ,health groups HPLP-Ⅱ (98 .12 ± 7 .26) points .Health groups HPLP-Ⅱ score and all dimension scores were significantly lower than in healthy people (P<0 .05) . After Pearson correlation factor analysis ,sub‐health status and self‐realization ,exercise ,stress management was negatively correlated (P<0 .05) .Conclusion The proportion of sub‐health in urban residents is higher ,Sub‐health is related to health promotion way in which stress management ,exercise ,self‐realization are a protective factor of sub‐health .