中国美容医学
中國美容醫學
중국미용의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC MEDICINE
2015年
9期
46-48
,共3页
涂雪松%彭友林%胡友红
塗雪鬆%彭友林%鬍友紅
도설송%팽우림%호우홍
重度痤疮%罗红霉素胶囊%氯霉素酊%复方硫磺软膏%米诺环素胶囊%疗效
重度痤瘡%囉紅黴素膠囊%氯黴素酊%複方硫磺軟膏%米諾環素膠囊%療效
중도좌창%라홍매소효낭%록매소정%복방류광연고%미낙배소효낭%료효
severe acne%roxithromycin capsules%chloramphenicol tincture%compound sulfur ointment%minocycline hydrochloride capsules%curative effect
目的:比较两组用药方案治疗重度痤疮的临床疗效,以期对临床用药有所指导。方法:将88例门诊重度痤疮患者随机分成A、B组,A组:给予罗红霉素胶囊+氯霉素酊治疗;B组:给予盐酸米诺环素胶囊+复方硫磺软膏治疗,8周后观察疗效。结果:A、B组治疗的总有效率分别为81.8%、79.5%,两组间总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:对有适应证的重度痤疮患者,A组或B组或A、B组里的辅药互换都是治疗的不错选择。
目的:比較兩組用藥方案治療重度痤瘡的臨床療效,以期對臨床用藥有所指導。方法:將88例門診重度痤瘡患者隨機分成A、B組,A組:給予囉紅黴素膠囊+氯黴素酊治療;B組:給予鹽痠米諾環素膠囊+複方硫磺軟膏治療,8週後觀察療效。結果:A、B組治療的總有效率分彆為81.8%、79.5%,兩組間總有效率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);兩組不良反應髮生率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論:對有適應證的重度痤瘡患者,A組或B組或A、B組裏的輔藥互換都是治療的不錯選擇。
목적:비교량조용약방안치료중도좌창적림상료효,이기대림상용약유소지도。방법:장88례문진중도좌창환자수궤분성A、B조,A조:급여라홍매소효낭+록매소정치료;B조:급여염산미낙배소효낭+복방류광연고치료,8주후관찰료효。결과:A、B조치료적총유효솔분별위81.8%、79.5%,량조간총유효솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);량조불량반응발생솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론:대유괄응증적중도좌창환자,A조혹B조혹A、B조리적보약호환도시치료적불착선택。
Objective To compare the curative effects of two groups of medication on severe acne in order to guide the clinical medication. Methods 88 patients with severe acne were randomly divided into 2 groups.A group were used Roxithromycin Capsules and Chloramphenicol Tincture.B group were used Compound Sulfur Ointment and Minocycline Hydrochloride Capsules.Then observed the curative effect after 8 weeks. Results A group's total efficiency was 81.8%,and B was 79.5%(P>0.05). There were no significant differences between two groups. The main adverse reactions incidence were no significant differences(P>0.05). Conclusion The two groups of medication are good choices on severe acne.