CAJ | 학술논문

道德判断的研究一直存在情与理的争论。一段时间内，不同的研究者提出了各自不同的模型，如Piaget的理性模型﹑ Haidt的社会直觉模型等。但是Greene的双加工理论模型则将两者融合在一起。此后，随着研究的不断深入， Cushman发现道德判断存在两个区别的过程：一个过程涉及对行为者心理状态进行归因，一个过程涉及对行为结果和引起结果的原因进行归因。为此，他提出了道德判断的双加工过程模型，即道德判断的产生存在心理状态归因和因果归因两个过程。未来的研究需从研究材料﹑特殊人群﹑地区文化差异以及宗教信仰差异等方面，对道德判断模型进行比较和系统研究。
도덕판단적연구일직존재정여리적쟁론。일단시간내，불동적연구자제출료각자불동적모형，여Piaget적이성모형﹑ Haidt적사회직각모형등。단시Greene적쌍가공이론모형칙장량자융합재일기。차후，수착연구적불단심입， Cushman발현도덕판단존재량개구별적과정：일개과정섭급대행위자심리상태진행귀인，일개과정섭급대행위결과화인기결과적원인진행귀인。위차，타제출료도덕판단적쌍가공과정모형，즉도덕판단적산생존재심리상태귀인화인과귀인량개과정。미래적연구수종연구재료﹑특수인군﹑지구문화차이이급종교신앙차이등방면，대도덕판단모형진행비교화계통연구。
There has been controversy about the roles of emotion and reasoning in moral judgment. Over time, different researchers have put forward different models, such as Piaget’s rational model and Haidt’s social intuitionist model. However, Greene’s dual-process theory combines emotion with reasoning . With the deepening of research, Cushman finds a dual-process theory of moral judgment, which distinguishes two processes of moral judgment: one begins with harmful consequences and seeks a causally responsible agent, and the other begins with an action and analyzes the mental states responsible for that action. Future research is needed in terms of research material, special populations, geographical and cultural differences, and religious differences, for the systematic study of moral judgment model.