中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2015年
16期
114-116,117
,共4页
颅脑外伤%复合伤%护理%风险事件
顱腦外傷%複閤傷%護理%風險事件
로뇌외상%복합상%호리%풍험사건
Craniocerebral injury%Compound injury%Nursing%Risk accident
目的:探讨颅脑外伤合并复合伤患者临床治疗中风险事件的护理措施。方法:将78例颅脑外伤合并复合伤患者分为研究组和对照组,每组各39例。对颅脑外伤合并复合伤患者的临床护理风险进行评估,研究组根据评估结果制定综合护理措施,对照组给予常规护理。结果:护理前两组患者的HAMD评分、ADL评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后研究组ADL评分明显高于对照组,HAMD评分明显低于对照组,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组临床治疗过程中的风险事件发生率为15.4%,明显低于对照组的38.4%;研究组对本院护理工作的满意度为92.3%,明显高于对照组的74.4%,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对颅脑外伤合并复合伤患者实施综合护理,可有效降低临床风险事件发生率,改善患者临床治疗效果。
目的:探討顱腦外傷閤併複閤傷患者臨床治療中風險事件的護理措施。方法:將78例顱腦外傷閤併複閤傷患者分為研究組和對照組,每組各39例。對顱腦外傷閤併複閤傷患者的臨床護理風險進行評估,研究組根據評估結果製定綜閤護理措施,對照組給予常規護理。結果:護理前兩組患者的HAMD評分、ADL評分比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);護理後研究組ADL評分明顯高于對照組,HAMD評分明顯低于對照組,兩組比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。研究組臨床治療過程中的風險事件髮生率為15.4%,明顯低于對照組的38.4%;研究組對本院護理工作的滿意度為92.3%,明顯高于對照組的74.4%,兩組比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論:對顱腦外傷閤併複閤傷患者實施綜閤護理,可有效降低臨床風險事件髮生率,改善患者臨床治療效果。
목적:탐토로뇌외상합병복합상환자림상치료중풍험사건적호리조시。방법:장78례로뇌외상합병복합상환자분위연구조화대조조,매조각39례。대로뇌외상합병복합상환자적림상호리풍험진행평고,연구조근거평고결과제정종합호리조시,대조조급여상규호리。결과:호리전량조환자적HAMD평분、ADL평분비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);호리후연구조ADL평분명현고우대조조,HAMD평분명현저우대조조,량조비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。연구조림상치료과정중적풍험사건발생솔위15.4%,명현저우대조조적38.4%;연구조대본원호리공작적만의도위92.3%,명현고우대조조적74.4%,량조비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론:대로뇌외상합병복합상환자실시종합호리,가유효강저림상풍험사건발생솔,개선환자림상치료효과。
Objective:To explore the nursing measures of craniocerebral injury combined with risk accidents in clinical treatment of patients with compound injury.Method:78 patients of traumatic brain injury with complex trauma were selected and divided into the study group and the control group,39 cases in each group.The risk of traumatic brain injury with clinical care of patients with complex injuries were assessed,the study group was given a comprehensive care measures based on the assessment results,the control group was given routine care.Result:Before nursing,two groups of patients with HAMD score and ADL score had no significant difference(P>0.05).After nursing,study group’s ADL scores were significantly higher than those of control group,HAMD score was significantly lower than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The study group clinical treatment of risk in the process of the accident rate was 15.4%,significantly lower than the control group of 38.4%,the satisfaction of nursing in study group was 92.3%,significantly higher than the control group of 74.4%,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The comprehensive nursing of craniocerebral injury combined with multiple trauma patients,can effectively reduce the incidence rate of clinical risk accidents,improve the clinical treatment effect.