中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2015年
9期
117-118,129
,共3页
预见性护理%急诊%急救应用%护理思维
預見性護理%急診%急救應用%護理思維
예견성호리%급진%급구응용%호리사유
Predictive nursing care%Emergency treatment%Emergency applications%Nursing thinking
目的:探讨预见性护理思维在抢救中的应用效果。方法选取2013年1~12月应用预见性护理思维护理救护患者100例为观察组,2012年1~12月接受常规救护患者100例为对照组,观察两组护理效果。结果观察组得到抢救平均时间为(2.6±0.8)min,对照组为(3.7±0.9)min,差异有统计学意义(P <0.01);观察组患者抢救成功率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组患者护患矛盾发生率、医患纠纷发生率、并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组患者满意度为97.0%(97/100),对照组为86.0%(86/100),差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。结论预见性护理在抢救中能明显提高护理服务质量水平,能为患者提供优质护理服务。
目的:探討預見性護理思維在搶救中的應用效果。方法選取2013年1~12月應用預見性護理思維護理救護患者100例為觀察組,2012年1~12月接受常規救護患者100例為對照組,觀察兩組護理效果。結果觀察組得到搶救平均時間為(2.6±0.8)min,對照組為(3.7±0.9)min,差異有統計學意義(P <0.01);觀察組患者搶救成功率明顯高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P <0.05);觀察組患者護患矛盾髮生率、醫患糾紛髮生率、併髮癥髮生率均低于對照組,差異均有統計學意義(P <0.05);觀察組患者滿意度為97.0%(97/100),對照組為86.0%(86/100),差異有統計學意義(P <0.01)。結論預見性護理在搶救中能明顯提高護理服務質量水平,能為患者提供優質護理服務。
목적:탐토예견성호리사유재창구중적응용효과。방법선취2013년1~12월응용예견성호리사유호리구호환자100례위관찰조,2012년1~12월접수상규구호환자100례위대조조,관찰량조호리효과。결과관찰조득도창구평균시간위(2.6±0.8)min,대조조위(3.7±0.9)min,차이유통계학의의(P <0.01);관찰조환자창구성공솔명현고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P <0.05);관찰조환자호환모순발생솔、의환규분발생솔、병발증발생솔균저우대조조,차이균유통계학의의(P <0.05);관찰조환자만의도위97.0%(97/100),대조조위86.0%(86/100),차이유통계학의의(P <0.01)。결론예견성호리재창구중능명현제고호리복무질량수평,능위환자제공우질호리복무。
Objective To explore the effect of application of predictive nursing thinking in emergency rescue. Methods 100 patients who received predictive nursing thinking from January to December 2013 were selected as observation group. 100 patients who received conventional nursing care from January to December 2012 were selected as control group. The effect of nursing care were observed. Results The mean rescue time in observation group was (2.6±0.8) min,and that in control group was (3.7±0.9) min. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The rate of successful rescue in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The rate of nurse-patient disputes, patient-hospital disputes, incidence of complications and satisfactory degree were all lower than those in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The satisfactory degree was 97.0% (97/100) with 86.0% (86/100) in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion Predictive nursing can significantly improve nursing quality in rescue and can provide patients with high-quality nursing care.