医院管理论坛
醫院管理論罈
의원관이론단
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT FORUM
2015年
6期
74-75,52
,共3页
包雪青%王丽娟%夏捷%王爱霞
包雪青%王麗娟%夏捷%王愛霞
포설청%왕려연%하첩%왕애하
心理护理%肝胆外科
心理護理%肝膽外科
심리호리%간담외과
Psychological nursing%Department of hepatobiliary surgery
目的了解心理护理在肝胆外科疾病患者中的临床护理管理效果。方法对来院诊治的80例患者入院资料进行分析,将其随机分为两组。对照组采用常规方法护理,试验组采用心理护理,比较两组护理效果。结果试验组护理后90%一般健康知识了解良好,95%患者有自我保健意识,90%能够养成健康习惯,分别高于对照组(72.5%,80%,85%)(P<0.05);试验组护理后SDS评分为(31.58±8.29)分、SAS评分为(31.89±7.72)分,低于对照组(SDS评分为(41.34±10.33)分、SAS评分为(47.09±12.07)分)(P<0.05);试验组自觉症状评分为(66±5)、心理情绪状态为(13±5)、日常生活为(22±3)、社会活动为(22±3)均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论肝胆外科疾病发病率较高,临床上采用心理护理效果理想,值得推广使用。
目的瞭解心理護理在肝膽外科疾病患者中的臨床護理管理效果。方法對來院診治的80例患者入院資料進行分析,將其隨機分為兩組。對照組採用常規方法護理,試驗組採用心理護理,比較兩組護理效果。結果試驗組護理後90%一般健康知識瞭解良好,95%患者有自我保健意識,90%能夠養成健康習慣,分彆高于對照組(72.5%,80%,85%)(P<0.05);試驗組護理後SDS評分為(31.58±8.29)分、SAS評分為(31.89±7.72)分,低于對照組(SDS評分為(41.34±10.33)分、SAS評分為(47.09±12.07)分)(P<0.05);試驗組自覺癥狀評分為(66±5)、心理情緒狀態為(13±5)、日常生活為(22±3)、社會活動為(22±3)均高于對照組(P<0.05)。結論肝膽外科疾病髮病率較高,臨床上採用心理護理效果理想,值得推廣使用。
목적료해심리호리재간담외과질병환자중적림상호리관리효과。방법대래원진치적80례환자입원자료진행분석,장기수궤분위량조。대조조채용상규방법호리,시험조채용심리호리,비교량조호리효과。결과시험조호리후90%일반건강지식료해량호,95%환자유자아보건의식,90%능구양성건강습관,분별고우대조조(72.5%,80%,85%)(P<0.05);시험조호리후SDS평분위(31.58±8.29)분、SAS평분위(31.89±7.72)분,저우대조조(SDS평분위(41.34±10.33)분、SAS평분위(47.09±12.07)분)(P<0.05);시험조자각증상평분위(66±5)、심리정서상태위(13±5)、일상생활위(22±3)、사회활동위(22±3)균고우대조조(P<0.05)。결론간담외과질병발병솔교고,림상상채용심리호리효과이상,치득추엄사용。
Objective To learn the clinical nursing management effects of psychological nursing on patients in department of hepatobiliary surgery. Methods Analyzed the information of 80 cases who were admitted into hospital and randomly divided them into two groups. The control group took conventional nursing methods, while treatment group took psychological nursing. Compared the nursing results of two groups.Results 90% patients from treatment group well understood the general health knowledge after nursing. 95% patients had the self-care consciousness. 90% can develop healthy habits. The above three aspects were higher than those of control group (72.5%, 80%, 85%)(P<0.05). The SDS score of treatment group after nursing was 31.58±8.29 while SAS score was 31.89±7.72, lower than those of control group, in which SDS score was 41.34±10.33 while SAS score was 47.09±12.07 (P<0.05). The subjective symptom score of treatment group was 66±5, mental and emotional states were scored 13±5, daily life was 22± 3 and social activities was 22±3, all of which were higher than those of control group (P < 0.05).Conclusion The incidence of hepatobiliary surgery disease is high. The effect of psychological nursing in clinical care is ideal, which should be further promoted.