中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2015年
10期
187-189
,共3页
压抑疗法%遮盖法%儿童单眼弱视
壓抑療法%遮蓋法%兒童單眼弱視
압억요법%차개법%인동단안약시
Depression therapy%Occlusion therapy%Children with monocular amblyopia
目的:探究临床治疗儿童单眼弱视的可靠方法,为儿童单眼弱视的临床治疗提供借鉴和参考。方法选取2012年12月~2013年4月期间我院收治的156例儿童单眼弱视患儿为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分成了压抑疗法组和遮盖法组,分别采用压抑疗法和遮盖法进行治疗。比较两组的临床整体疗效和弱势立体视重建效果。结果(1)比较两组入选对象的临床治疗总有效率,压抑疗法组显著高于遮盖法组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(x2=10.065,P=0.002);(2)比较两组入选对象的立体视重建总有效率,压抑疗法组显著高于遮盖法组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(x2=8.892,P=0.003)。结论在临床针对学龄儿童单眼弱视群体实施治疗的实践过程中,与遮盖法相比较采用压抑疗法的临床整体效果更好,是临床治疗学龄儿童单眼弱视的理想选择之一。
目的:探究臨床治療兒童單眼弱視的可靠方法,為兒童單眼弱視的臨床治療提供藉鑒和參攷。方法選取2012年12月~2013年4月期間我院收治的156例兒童單眼弱視患兒為研究對象,採用隨機數字錶法分成瞭壓抑療法組和遮蓋法組,分彆採用壓抑療法和遮蓋法進行治療。比較兩組的臨床整體療效和弱勢立體視重建效果。結果(1)比較兩組入選對象的臨床治療總有效率,壓抑療法組顯著高于遮蓋法組,兩組比較差異具有統計學意義(x2=10.065,P=0.002);(2)比較兩組入選對象的立體視重建總有效率,壓抑療法組顯著高于遮蓋法組,兩組比較差異具有統計學意義(x2=8.892,P=0.003)。結論在臨床針對學齡兒童單眼弱視群體實施治療的實踐過程中,與遮蓋法相比較採用壓抑療法的臨床整體效果更好,是臨床治療學齡兒童單眼弱視的理想選擇之一。
목적:탐구림상치료인동단안약시적가고방법,위인동단안약시적림상치료제공차감화삼고。방법선취2012년12월~2013년4월기간아원수치적156례인동단안약시환인위연구대상,채용수궤수자표법분성료압억요법조화차개법조,분별채용압억요법화차개법진행치료。비교량조적림상정체료효화약세입체시중건효과。결과(1)비교량조입선대상적림상치료총유효솔,압억요법조현저고우차개법조,량조비교차이구유통계학의의(x2=10.065,P=0.002);(2)비교량조입선대상적입체시중건총유효솔,압억요법조현저고우차개법조,량조비교차이구유통계학의의(x2=8.892,P=0.003)。결론재림상침대학령인동단안약시군체실시치료적실천과정중,여차개법상비교채용압억요법적림상정체효과경호,시림상치료학령인동단안약시적이상선택지일。
Objective To explore the reliable method for clinical treatment of children with monocular amblyopia,and provide the reference for the clinical treatment of children with monocular amblyopia. Methods 156 cases of children with monocular amblyopia in our hospital from 2012 December to 2013 April were selected as the research object,according to the random number table method they were randomly divided into the therapy group and shaded depression group,they were treated by depression therapy and occlusion therapy.Clinical efficacy and weak overall three-dimensional visual effect of reconstruction were compared between the two groups. Results (1) Compared two groups of clinical treatment of selected objects with the total efficiency,depression therapy group was significantly higher than that of covering groups,statistical results show statistically significant differences between the data comparison (x2=10.065,P=0.002);(2)Stereopsis reconstruction were compared between the two groups of selected objects with the total efficiency,depression therapy group obviously higher than the covering group,statistical results show statistically significant differences between the data comparison (x2=8.8923,P=0.003). Conclusion In the clinical implementation for school-age children with monocular amblyopia group practice process treatment,compared with occlusion therapy by depression therapy better overall effect,is one of the ideal choice for clinical treatment of school-age children with monocular amblyopia.