中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2015年
12期
1765-1767
,共3页
占海晏%臧国礼%金振晓%陈日曙
佔海晏%臧國禮%金振曉%陳日曙
점해안%장국례%금진효%진일서
超声检查%乳腺肿瘤
超聲檢查%乳腺腫瘤
초성검사%유선종류
Ultrasound examination%Breast neoplasms
目的:探讨超声造影与弹性应变率比值对超声乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS-US)检查Ⅲ~Ⅴ级乳腺肿块的诊断价值。方法169例 BI-RADS-US 诊断为Ⅲ~Ⅴ级的乳腺肿块患者术前1周分别行超声造影与弹性成像检查,分析超声造影声像图及时间-强度曲线(TIC)特征并测定弹性应变率比值,以术后病理结果为金标准,评估两种检查方法对 BI-RADS-US Ⅲ~Ⅴ级乳腺肿块诊断的灵敏度、特异度。结果超声造影与弹性应变率比值测定联合应用对于 BI-RADS-US Ⅲ~Ⅴ级乳腺肿块诊断的灵敏度、特异度及准确率分别为96.15%、94.34%及95.11%,高于采用单一方法(χ2=4.659,P =0.032;χ2=4.146,P =0.041)。结论超声造影与弹性应变率比值能够使 BI-RADS-US Ⅲ~Ⅴ级误判的乳腺肿块得以纠正,进一步提高乳腺良恶性病变诊断的特异度及准确率。
目的:探討超聲造影與彈性應變率比值對超聲乳腺影像報告和數據繫統(BI-RADS-US)檢查Ⅲ~Ⅴ級乳腺腫塊的診斷價值。方法169例 BI-RADS-US 診斷為Ⅲ~Ⅴ級的乳腺腫塊患者術前1週分彆行超聲造影與彈性成像檢查,分析超聲造影聲像圖及時間-彊度麯線(TIC)特徵併測定彈性應變率比值,以術後病理結果為金標準,評估兩種檢查方法對 BI-RADS-US Ⅲ~Ⅴ級乳腺腫塊診斷的靈敏度、特異度。結果超聲造影與彈性應變率比值測定聯閤應用對于 BI-RADS-US Ⅲ~Ⅴ級乳腺腫塊診斷的靈敏度、特異度及準確率分彆為96.15%、94.34%及95.11%,高于採用單一方法(χ2=4.659,P =0.032;χ2=4.146,P =0.041)。結論超聲造影與彈性應變率比值能夠使 BI-RADS-US Ⅲ~Ⅴ級誤判的乳腺腫塊得以糾正,進一步提高乳腺良噁性病變診斷的特異度及準確率。
목적:탐토초성조영여탄성응변솔비치대초성유선영상보고화수거계통(BI-RADS-US)검사Ⅲ~Ⅴ급유선종괴적진단개치。방법169례 BI-RADS-US 진단위Ⅲ~Ⅴ급적유선종괴환자술전1주분별행초성조영여탄성성상검사,분석초성조영성상도급시간-강도곡선(TIC)특정병측정탄성응변솔비치,이술후병리결과위금표준,평고량충검사방법대 BI-RADS-US Ⅲ~Ⅴ급유선종괴진단적령민도、특이도。결과초성조영여탄성응변솔비치측정연합응용대우 BI-RADS-US Ⅲ~Ⅴ급유선종괴진단적령민도、특이도급준학솔분별위96.15%、94.34%급95.11%,고우채용단일방법(χ2=4.659,P =0.032;χ2=4.146,P =0.041)。결론초성조영여탄성응변솔비치능구사 BI-RADS-US Ⅲ~Ⅴ급오판적유선종괴득이규정,진일보제고유선량악성병변진단적특이도급준학솔。
Objective To evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions with BI -RADS Ⅲ -Ⅴ.Methods 169 patients with BI -RADS Ⅲ -Ⅴ breast lesions were underwent contrast -enhanced ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography 1 week before surgery.Pathological findings were used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast -enhanced ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography in diagnosis of BI -RADS Ⅲ -Ⅴ breast lesions.Results The combination of contrast -enhanced ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography in diagnosis of BI -RADS Ⅲ -Ⅴ breast lesions,with the sensitivi-ty,specificity and accuracy of 96.15%,94.34%,and 95.11%,respectively.The difference was statistical signifi-cance compared with single method(χ2 =4.659,P =0.032,χ2 =4.146,P =0.041).Conclusion The combination of contrast -enhanced ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography improves the diagnostic accuracy of Ⅲ-Ⅴ breast lesions.