CAJ | 학술논문

目的：评价 UF‐1000i 尿沉渣分析仪与相差显微镜在血尿来源鉴别中的价值。方法该院肾内科2013年12月至2014年5月确诊的血尿患者98例，均进行尿沉渣检测和尿相差显微镜镜检，以临床诊断结果为标准，计算 UF‐1000i 尿沉渣分析仪与相差显微镜镜检的灵敏度及特异度，并进行比较。结果 UF‐1000i 尿沉渣分析仪的灵敏度（95．3％）高于相差显微镜（81．9％），差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05），而相差显微镜的特异度（92．3％）高于 UF‐1000i 尿沉渣分析仪检查的特异度（89．2％），差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。结论 UF‐1000i 尿沉渣分析仪与相差显微镜结合使用在血尿来源鉴别中具有重要作用。
목적：평개 UF‐1000i 뇨침사분석의여상차현미경재혈뇨래원감별중적개치。방법해원신내과2013년12월지2014년5월학진적혈뇨환자98례，균진행뇨침사검측화뇨상차현미경경검，이림상진단결과위표준，계산 UF‐1000i 뇨침사분석의여상차현미경경검적령민도급특이도，병진행비교。결과 UF‐1000i 뇨침사분석의적령민도（95．3％）고우상차현미경（81．9％），차이유통계학의의（P＜0．05），이상차현미경적특이도（92．3％）고우 UF‐1000i 뇨침사분석의검사적특이도（89．2％），차이유통계학의의（P＜0．05）。결론 UF‐1000i 뇨침사분석의여상차현미경결합사용재혈뇨래원감별중구유중요작용。
Objective To compare the value of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer and phase‐contrast microscopy in identify source of hematuria .Methods A total of 98 patients diagnosed as hematuresis from December 2013 to May 2014 in the Affiliated Hospital of Putian Institute were enrolled in this study .Both the urinary sediment examination and phase‐contrast microscopy ex‐amination were conducted on the patients .According to clinical diagnosis results ,the sensitivity and specificity of the two methods were calculated and compared .Results The sensitivity of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer (95 .3% ) was higher than that of the phase contrast microscope (81 .9% ) ,the difference was significant (P < 0 .05) ,while the specificity of phase contrast microscope (92 .3% ) was higher than that of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer(89 .2% ) ,the difference was significant(P < 0 .05) .Conclu‐sion Combining application of UF‐1000i urinary sediment analyzer and phase contrast microscope has great clinical significance .