CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察卡马西平与丙戊酸钠缓释片治疗脑炎后癫痫的临床疗效，并对比两者的治疗效果。方法将2013～2014年在我院接受治疗的90例脑炎后癫痫患者作为研究对象，将其随机分为A组和B组，每组45例。给予A组患者卡马西平进行治疗，给予B组患者丙戊酸钠缓释片进行治疗，观察并对比两组患者的治疗效果以及不良反应情况。结果两组患者的治疗总有效率的差异不具有统计学意义（P>0.05）。两组患者的不良反应发生率的差异不具有统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论卡马西平与丙戊酸钠缓释片治疗脑炎后癫痫的临床疗效相当。
목적：관찰잡마서평여병무산납완석편치료뇌염후전간적림상료효，병대비량자적치료효과。방법장2013～2014년재아원접수치료적90례뇌염후전간환자작위연구대상，장기수궤분위A조화B조，매조45례。급여A조환자잡마서평진행치료，급여B조환자병무산납완석편진행치료，관찰병대비량조환자적치료효과이급불량반응정황。결과량조환자적치료총유효솔적차이불구유통계학의의（P>0.05）。량조환자적불량반응발생솔적차이불구유통계학의의（P>0.05）。결론잡마서평여병무산납완석편치료뇌염후전간적림상료효상당。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical efficacy of carbamazepine and sodium valproate in the treatment of post-encephalitic epilepsy. Methods 90 cases of post-encephalitic epilepsy patients were treated in our hospital from 2013 to 2014. The patients were randomly divided into group A and group B,45 cases in each group. The patients of A group were treated by carbamazepine. The patients of B group were treated by sodium valproate. Therapeutic effects and adverse reactions were observed and compared. Results The two groups have no significant difference in the total efficiency(P>0.05),the difference was not statistical y significant. The rate of adverse reaction has no significant difference in two groups on the(P>0.05),the difference was not statistical y significant. Conclusion Carbamazepine and sodium valproate have the same effect in the treatment of post-encephalitic epilepsy.