CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对胺碘酮治疗心律失常的临床治疗效果进行观察并分析。方法选取2014年我院收治的100例心律失常患者作为研究对象，将其随机分为对照组和观察组，每组各50例。对照组患者使用心律平进行治疗，观察组患者使用胺碘酮进行治疗。对两组患者的疗效进行观察对比。结果观察组患者的疗效优于对照组（P<0.05）。两组患者均未出现严重的不良反应。结论与心律平相比，胺碘酮治疗心律失常的疗效更加显著。
목적：대알전동치료심률실상적림상치료효과진행관찰병분석。방법선취2014년아원수치적100례심률실상환자작위연구대상，장기수궤분위대조조화관찰조，매조각50례。대조조환자사용심률평진행치료，관찰조환자사용알전동진행치료。대량조환자적료효진행관찰대비。결과관찰조환자적료효우우대조조（P<0.05）。량조환자균미출현엄중적불량반응。결론여심률평상비，알전동치료심률실상적료효경가현저。
ObjectiveTo observe and analyze the clinical effect of amiodarone in the treatment ofarrhythmia. Methods 100 cases of patients with arrhythmia were selected as the research object in 2014 in our hospital. The patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group,50 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were using propafenone while that of observation group were treated with amiodarone. Curative effect of two groups were compared after treatment. Results The curative effect of observation group was significantly better than that of control group(P<0.05). Serious adverse reactions were not found in the two groups of patients. Conclusion The effect of amiodarone in treatment of arrhythmia is better than propafenone.