中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
CHINA HEALTH STANDARD MANAGEMENT
2015年
13期
86-87
,共2页
开胸手术%胸腔镜手术%原发性肺癌
開胸手術%胸腔鏡手術%原髮性肺癌
개흉수술%흉강경수술%원발성폐암
Open chest operation%Thoracic operation%Primary lung cancer
目的：比较开胸手术和胸腔镜下手术在原发性肺癌治疗中的应用价值。方法将72例原发性肺癌患者分为两组，对照组行开胸手术，观察组行腹腔镜手术，对比两组治疗情况及并发症。结果观察组中出血量、切口长度、引流时间、住院时间及并发症发生率均少于对照组，两组清扫淋巴结数量差异不显著。结论胸腔镜治疗原发性肺癌安全可靠。
目的：比較開胸手術和胸腔鏡下手術在原髮性肺癌治療中的應用價值。方法將72例原髮性肺癌患者分為兩組，對照組行開胸手術，觀察組行腹腔鏡手術，對比兩組治療情況及併髮癥。結果觀察組中齣血量、切口長度、引流時間、住院時間及併髮癥髮生率均少于對照組，兩組清掃淋巴結數量差異不顯著。結論胸腔鏡治療原髮性肺癌安全可靠。
목적：비교개흉수술화흉강경하수술재원발성폐암치료중적응용개치。방법장72례원발성폐암환자분위량조，대조조행개흉수술，관찰조행복강경수술，대비량조치료정황급병발증。결과관찰조중출혈량、절구장도、인류시간、주원시간급병발증발생솔균소우대조조，량조청소림파결수량차이불현저。결론흉강경치료원발성폐암안전가고。
Objective To compare the application value of open chest operation and thoracoscopic operation in the treatment of primary lung cancer. Methods 72 patients with primary lung cancer were divided into two groups, the control group underwent thoracotomy, the observation group underwent laparoscopic surgery, compared the two groups of treatment and complications. Results The amount of bleeding, incision length, drainage time, hospitalization time and complication rate of the observation group were less than those of the control group, and the number of lymph nodes in the two groups was not significantly different.Conclusion VATS is safe and reliable in treatment of primary lung cancer.
