中国继续医学教育
中國繼續醫學教育
중국계속의학교육
CHINA CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
2015年
14期
112-113
,共2页
腹腔镜%巨脾%脾切除术
腹腔鏡%巨脾%脾切除術
복강경%거비%비절제술
Laparoscopic%Splenomegaly%Splenectomy
目的:探究开腹手术及腹腔镜手术方式的优缺点,指导巨脾手术方式的合理选择。方法选取我院50例巨脾患者为研究对象,随机分成观察组(LS组)和对照组(OS组),分别行腹腔镜手术和开腹手术。结果除手术时间上,术中出血量、住院时间、肠道功能恢复时间对比上,LS组均优于OS组,差异具有统计学意义。结论与传统开腹手术对比,腹腔镜下巨脾切除术的疗效更好、术中出血量少、术后恢复快。
目的:探究開腹手術及腹腔鏡手術方式的優缺點,指導巨脾手術方式的閤理選擇。方法選取我院50例巨脾患者為研究對象,隨機分成觀察組(LS組)和對照組(OS組),分彆行腹腔鏡手術和開腹手術。結果除手術時間上,術中齣血量、住院時間、腸道功能恢複時間對比上,LS組均優于OS組,差異具有統計學意義。結論與傳統開腹手術對比,腹腔鏡下巨脾切除術的療效更好、術中齣血量少、術後恢複快。
목적:탐구개복수술급복강경수술방식적우결점,지도거비수술방식적합리선택。방법선취아원50례거비환자위연구대상,수궤분성관찰조(LS조)화대조조(OS조),분별행복강경수술화개복수술。결과제수술시간상,술중출혈량、주원시간、장도공능회복시간대비상,LS조균우우OS조,차이구유통계학의의。결론여전통개복수술대비,복강경하거비절제술적료효경호、술중출혈량소、술후회복쾌。
Objective To explore the advantages and disadvantages of open surgery and laparoscopic surgical procedures, guidance splenomegaly reasonable choice of surgical approach.Methods 50 cases of splenomegaly in our hospital patients in this study were randomly divided into observation group (LS) and the control group (OS group), respectively, laparoscopic surgery and open surgery.Results In addition to the operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, recovery time of bowel function contrast, LS group were significantly better than the OS group, a statistically significant difference.ConclusionCompared with traditional laparotomy, laparoscopic splenectomy a better curative effect, less intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery fast.