中国现代医生
中國現代醫生
중국현대의생
CHINA MODERN DOCTOR
2015年
16期
86-88,91
,共4页
人工皮%红霉素软膏%新生儿%皮肤损伤
人工皮%紅黴素軟膏%新生兒%皮膚損傷
인공피%홍매소연고%신생인%피부손상
Artificial skin%Erythromycin ointment%Newborns%Skin injury
目的:通过探讨人工皮(亲水性敷料)与红霉素软膏治疗新生儿皮肤损伤的疗效,旨在为临床快速促进新生儿皮肤损伤恢复并提高治疗效率提供理论依据。方法选择2014年3月~2015年3月在我院接受治疗的新生儿皮肤损伤160例,随机平均分成研究组和对照组两组,对照组患儿给予红霉素软膏治疗,研究组患儿给予人工皮(亲水性敷料)进行治疗,对比两组患儿伤口愈合时间、平均换药次数、并发症发生率、未愈率及治疗有效率。结果研究组患儿伤口愈合时间(4.47±0.76)d、平均换药次数(3.18±0.52)次、并发症发生率5.00%、未愈率3.75%、治疗有效率95.00%,研究组均显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论人工皮(亲水性敷料)在治疗新生儿皮肤损伤时可快速促进伤口愈合、减少换药次数并提高治疗有效率。
目的:通過探討人工皮(親水性敷料)與紅黴素軟膏治療新生兒皮膚損傷的療效,旨在為臨床快速促進新生兒皮膚損傷恢複併提高治療效率提供理論依據。方法選擇2014年3月~2015年3月在我院接受治療的新生兒皮膚損傷160例,隨機平均分成研究組和對照組兩組,對照組患兒給予紅黴素軟膏治療,研究組患兒給予人工皮(親水性敷料)進行治療,對比兩組患兒傷口愈閤時間、平均換藥次數、併髮癥髮生率、未愈率及治療有效率。結果研究組患兒傷口愈閤時間(4.47±0.76)d、平均換藥次數(3.18±0.52)次、併髮癥髮生率5.00%、未愈率3.75%、治療有效率95.00%,研究組均顯著優于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論人工皮(親水性敷料)在治療新生兒皮膚損傷時可快速促進傷口愈閤、減少換藥次數併提高治療有效率。
목적:통과탐토인공피(친수성부료)여홍매소연고치료신생인피부손상적료효,지재위림상쾌속촉진신생인피부손상회복병제고치료효솔제공이론의거。방법선택2014년3월~2015년3월재아원접수치료적신생인피부손상160례,수궤평균분성연구조화대조조량조,대조조환인급여홍매소연고치료,연구조환인급여인공피(친수성부료)진행치료,대비량조환인상구유합시간、평균환약차수、병발증발생솔、미유솔급치료유효솔。결과연구조환인상구유합시간(4.47±0.76)d、평균환약차수(3.18±0.52)차、병발증발생솔5.00%、미유솔3.75%、치료유효솔95.00%,연구조균현저우우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론인공피(친수성부료)재치료신생인피부손상시가쾌속촉진상구유합、감소환약차수병제고치료유효솔。
Objective To explore the curative effects of artificial skin(hydrocolloid dressing) and erythromycin ointment in the treatment of neonatal skin injury, and to provide theoretical evidences for the promotion of clinically rapid recov-ery of neonatal skin injury and the improvement of curative effects. Methods A total of 160 patients with neonatal skin injury who were treated in our hospital from March 2014 to March 2015 were selected. They were randomly and aver-agely assigned to two groups, research group and control group. Infant patients in the control group were given the treatment of erythromycin ointment, and infant patients in the research group were given the treatment of artificial skin (hydrophilic dressing). Wound healing time, average frequency of dressing change, incidence of complications, non-cure rate and effective rate of treatment were compared between the two groups of infant patients. Results In infant patients of the research group, wound healing time was (4.47±0.76) d, average frequency of dressing change was (3.18±0.52) times, incidence of complications was 5.00%, non-cure rate was 3.75% and effective rate of treatment was 95.00%. All in-dices in the research group were significantly better than those in the control group, and the differences were statisti-cally significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Artificial skin (hydrophilic dressing) in the treatment of neonatal skin injury is able to promote the wound healing rapidly, can reduce the frequency of dressing change and improve the effective rate of treatment.