CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探究前列腺增生患者采用经尿道电切术治疗的方法和效果。方法选取2013年3月～2014年11月收治的36例前列增生患者进行治疗，随机分组，实验组21例患者选择经尿道电切术的治疗，对照组15例患者采用常规的手术方法，对比患者治疗后身体的恢复情况。结果实验组患者手术时间、术中的出血量、术后的冲洗时间和住院时间低于对照组，且实验组并发率为4.8%，对照组并发率为20.0%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论前列腺增生患者采用经尿道电切术治疗，术中的出血量较少，操作简便，安全性高，术后很少出现并发症。
목적：탐구전렬선증생환자채용경뇨도전절술치료적방법화효과。방법선취2013년3월～2014년11월수치적36례전렬증생환자진행치료，수궤분조，실험조21례환자선택경뇨도전절술적치료，대조조15례환자채용상규적수술방법，대비환자치료후신체적회복정황。결과실험조환자수술시간、술중적출혈량、술후적충세시간화주원시간저우대조조，차실험조병발솔위4.8%，대조조병발솔위20.0%，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론전렬선증생환자채용경뇨도전절술치료，술중적출혈량교소，조작간편，안전성고，술후흔소출현병발증。
Objective To explore the method and effect of transurethral resection in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods 36 cases of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who were treated in hospital were chose from March 2013 to November 2014 and the patients were randomly divided into study group and control group. 21 patients of study group were given transurethral resection treatment while 15 patients of control group were given conventional surgery treatment. The recovery condition of body was compared between two groups. Results The surgery time,bleeding capacity in operation,postoperative cleansing time and hospitalization days of study group were much more favorable than counterparts of control group. The complication incidence of study group was 4.8%while that was 20.0%of control group. There is significant difference between two groups(P<0.05). Conclusion The patients prostatic hyperplasia use the transurethral resection is conducive to reducing operation bleeding loss and it is easy to operate with high safety. The treatment method has less postoperative complications and is effective in treatment of prostatic hyperplasia.